Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections", CA-95:01, January 1995. Available via anonymous ftp from info.cert.org in /pub/cert_advisories.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....(a 7 ; a 13 ; p 0 ) i 11 ; i 13 ; a 7 ; a 13 ; p 0 ) i that represents a datagram from host H 4 to host H 9 along route hL 4 ; H 7 ; L 5 i, it is SS(d) fH 5 ; H 6 ; H 7 ; H 8 g. 5 Spoofing When a host tries to impersonate another host in a communication, we are in presence of spoofing [5]. The spoofed host may have a privileged access to the attacked host or may be regarded as a source of sensitive information. For example, the rsh and rlogin protocols allow sessions to be established between hosts without the need to provide any valid password if the connecting host is trusted. ....

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT). IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections. CA-95:01, January 1995.

....a s ; p c ; p s ; seq 0 c 1; seq 0 s 1; fACKg; p 00 empty ) where p 00 empty represents a null payload. 4 MODELING VULNERABILITIES The network model presented so far can be used to model network security vulnerabilities [14, 1] Here, as an example, we will describe IP spoofing [7]. Other attacks have been modeled in [23] When a host tries to masquerade as another host in a communication, we are in presence of spoofing. The impersonated host may have a privileged access to the attacked host or may be regarded as a source of sensitive information. For example, the rsh and ....

Computer Emergency Response Team. IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections. CA95: 01, January 1995.

....are physically located within academic environments, and they are highly motivated to access and modify grades and other information. Network break ins and subsequent time lost recovering from break ins and deletion of data have become a fact of day to day life at educational institutions [5, 7] In a corporate environment, the natural place to draw a security perimeter is around the corporation itself. However, in an academic environment, as depicted in Figure 1b, it is nearly impossible to draw a perimeter surrounding all of the people with whom we need to interact closely and only ....

Computer Emergency Response Team. "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections." CERT Advisory CA:95:01, January 1995.

....When communication requires transparent mobility, there still remains a choice of packet delivery methods. An important example is communication that must traverse security conscious boundary routers. As a result of IP address spoofing attacks, and in accordance with the IAB [6] and CERT [4] advisories, more routers are filtering on the source address as well (ingress filtering) and will drop a packet whose address is not topologically correct (whose originating network cannot be the one identified by the source address) In the presence of such routers, the triangle route as ....

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections. " CA-95:01, January 1995.

....to allocate large data structures in response to any SYN packet, without any guarantee of its authenticity. The three way handshake requires the sequence number y to match between the second and third message to protect against accidentally reopened old connections and unauthorized access (see [3]) The destination therefore needs to either store its ISS y between sending the second message and receiving the third message, or be able to regenerate y at the time the third message of the three way handshake is received. If there were no mechanism to regenerate y and the destination didn t ....

....it can recalculate y 0 by using its secret key, sequence number, the addresses, and the ports found in that message. If y 0 matches the y in ACK y 1 , the connection is legitimate, otherwise it is not. Note that this solution also provides some protection against sequence number prediction ([3]) because of the statistical properties of good hash functions. Although this approach prevents the SYN flooding attack, it has considerable drawbacks. This solution requires the modification of the TCP standard and consequently every TCP implementation. It is impossible to provide the fault ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections, Jan. 1995. CA-95:01.

....to determine the initiator of a connection. However, connection authentication still needs to validate that all data received at the destination was indeed sent by the originally authenticated initiator. This protects against threats of active wiretapping, such as connection highjacking, e.g. [12]. The second aspect of connection authentication is the assurance of integrity of transmitted data. Both components can be provided by the application of cryptographic mechanisms, e.g. a periodically transmitted hash value of previously sent data, signed by a key shared among the two connection ....

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections, January 1995. CA-95:01.

....privileges on the machine. However, some of the programming hooks provided for inter host security can also be used for enhancing the security of intra host communications (x 4.2. 4) Due to known weaknesses in the standard protocols (rexec and rsh) used for starting slave pvmds on a host [CERT94] CERT95] this research proposes using the Kerberos version of rsh or new protocols like SSH or STEL for securely spawning processes on a remote host. In order to set up secure communication among the hosts belonging to the virtual machine, a secret PVM session key needs to be established among the ....

Computer Emergency Response Team. "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections". CERT Advisory: CA-95:01, January 1995. URL: http://www.cert.org.

....Routes When communication requires transparent mobility, there still remains a choice of packet delivery methods. An important example is communication that must traverse securityconscious boundary routers. As a result of IP address spoofing attacks, and in accordance with the IAB [8] and CERT [4] advisory, more routers are filtering on the source address (ingress filtering) and will 1 One exception is the current web push technology which uses long lived transport connections, but it has been proposed that ultimately connectionless multicast should be used. Another exception is HTTP 1.1 ....

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT). IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections. In CA-95:01, 1995.

No context found.

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections", CA-95:01, January 1995. Available via anonymous ftp from info.cert.org in /pub/cert_advisories.

No context found.

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections", CA-95:01, January 1995. Available via anonymous ftp from info.cert.org in /pub/cert_advisories.

No context found.

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections", CA-95:01, January 1995. Available via anonymous ftp from info.cert.org.

No context found.

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), "IP Spoofing Attacks and Hijacked Terminal Connections", CA-95:01, January 1995. Available via anonymous ftp from info.cert.org in/pub/cert_advisories.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC