Whatmough P, Gale A, Wilson ARM. Do radiologists agree on the importance of mammographic features? In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, editors. Digital Mammography'96. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1996. p. 111-116.  Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
An Automatic Microcalcification Detection System Based .. - Papadopoulos.. (2002) (Correct)
.... resulting in a set of 22 features (Table 1) It must be noted that most of the selected features correspond to the mammographic characteristics that radiologists examine during a diagnostic procedure such as shape, density, size, distribution of the examined group or individual objects (Table 1) [53]. In the next step of the classification module the selected features are fed into a hybrid intelligent classification system, which consists of two components (Fig. 5) a rule based and a neural network component. The rule construction procedure consists of the feature identification step as ....
Whatmough P, Gale AG, Wilson A.R.M. Do radiologists agree on the importance of mammographic features? In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 1996. p. 111--6.
CADMIUM II: Acquisition and Representation of.. - Alberdi, Taylor.. (2000) (Correct)
No context found.
Whatmough P, Gale A, Wilson ARM. Do radiologists agree on the importance of mammographic features? In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, editors. Digital Mammography'96. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1996. p. 111-116.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC