T. Salonidis and P. Bhagwat, "Modeling and calculating the synchronization delay on pairs of Bluetooth devices", work in progress.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles

....delay will be as small as possible. 3.1. The nature of the state alternation schedule The first consideration refers to the way units alternate between the two states. More specifically, the first fundamental question is: should the units change states in a periodic or a random fashion In [3] it has been analytically proven that the mean connection time can be arbitrarily large when each unit changes states in a deterministic fashion. Intuitively, if the state residence intervals are fixed, the intervals of the merged process in Figure 2 will be fixed as well. Then the connection time ....

....than one sender nodes, a smaller T sender may be beneficial in order to minimize the probability of collision between sender units. The derivation of the formula is based on modeling the collision problem as a birthday attack one. It is omitted here due to lack of space and it can be found in [3]. 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 200 400 600 800 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Inquiry State mean residence time (ms) link formation delay (ms) x1 x2 x3 x4 x0.5 x0.333 x0.25 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 650 Back off interval (ms) link formation delay 0.01 0.1 1 Collision ....

T. Salonidis and P. Bhagwat, "Modeling and calculating the synchronization delay on pairs of Bluetooth devices", work in progress.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC