Bartram, L., Ware, C. and Calvert, T. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction, Interact 2001. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
From Data to Display: the Design and Evaluation of . . . - Ho-Ching (Correct)
....to identify the sound. From our visualization exercises with hearing participants, we learned that linking a sound with its source is important and so we chose to experiment with position in one display. When an important event occurs, often the user would like to be notified. Previous work [3] has suggested that animation is a more powerful visual signal than color change or shape change. Also [12] has suggested the use of discrete motion over continuous motion to reduce distraction. When there is little or no sound in a room, we would like the visualization to remain calm. The ....
....would always appear in the same area of the screen. A screen shot of the maximized window appears in Appendix IV. 7. 3 Experimental Variables The study had a 2x2x2 within subjects factorial design with a dual attention task based on experiments on performance using peripheral displays [3, 12, 18]. We manipulated three independent variables: prototype [Spectrograph, Ripples] background noise level [Quiet, Noisy] and notification sound [Door Knock, Phone Ring] The background noise was speech, produced by a random selection from five different speech files. These occurred at random time ....
Lyn Bartram, Colin Ware and Tom Calvert, "Moving icons: detection and distraction", In Proceedings of Interact 2001 Conference, (Waseda University, Japan, July 2001).
Phosphor: Explaining Transitions in the User Interface - Using Afterglow Effects (Correct)
No context found.
Bartram, L., Ware, C. and Calvert, T. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction, Interact 2001.
Phosphor: Explaining Transitions in the User Interface - Using Afterglow Effects (2006) (Correct)
No context found.
Bartram, L., Ware, C. and Calvert, T. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction, Interact 2001.
A Comparison of Two Peripheral Displays for Monitoring Email: .. - Hsieh, Mankoff (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
L. Bartram et al. Moving icons: Detection and distraction. Proc. Interact'01, 2001.
Challenges for Ubicomp Evaluation - Carter, Mankoff (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
L. Bartram, C. Ware, and T. Calvert. Moving icons: Detection and distraction. In M. Hirose, editor, Proceedings of Interact'01: Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, July 2001. IFIP, IOS Press.
A Comparison of Two Peripheral Displays for Monitoring Email: .. - Hsieh, Mankoff (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
L. Bartram et al. Moving icons: Detection and distraction. Proc. Interact'01, 2001.
Evaluating Graphical vs. Textual Secondary Displays.. - Somervell, Chewar.. (Correct)
No context found.
Bartram, L., Ware, C., & Calvert, T. Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2001), Tokyo, Japan. July 2001.
An Evaluation of Information Visualization in.. - Somervell.. (2002) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Lyn Bartram, Colin Ware, and Tom Calvert. Moving icons: Detection and distraction. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2001), Tokyo, Japan, July 2001.
Using Peripheral Displays to Provide the Deaf with.. - Ho-Ching, Mankoff.. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Bartram, L., et al. Moving Icons: Detection and distraction. In Proceedings of Interact 2001, pp. 157166, 2001.
From Data to Display: the Design and Evaluation of a.. - Ho-Ching, Mankoff.. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Bartram, Lyn, Ware, Colin, Calvert, Tom, Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction. In Proc. of Interact 2001, 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC