| Mead, G., Mind Self and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934. |
.... 1,2 s 2 , s 3 3,4 s 4 , 1,2 defines the relationship between s 1 and s 2 5 (see Allen s taxonomy of temporal relationships [1] or 3. This representation is consistent with social psychology work in which the society is considered prior to the individual, not the other way around [15] and has also been independently noted in [10] 16] 4. Execution in this context corresponds to searching through the space of partial plans if a node is expandable or processing a primitive action if not. 5. is a non commutative, non associative n ary operation (n 2) plan ....
G.H.Mead, (1934), "Mind, Self and Society", Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
....the unit of analysis from the individual agent to the entire multi agent system. This would be consistent with the symbolic interactionist school of social psychology which postulates that the conduct of individual entities should be explained in terms of the organised conduct of the social group (Mead, 1934) (rather than accounting for the organised conduct of the social group in terms of the separate individuals belonging to it) In this view, the Principle of Rationality would refer to the overall system rather than to its individual components (an approach which is broadly in line with the ....
Mead, G. H., (1934) "Mind, Self and Society" University of Chicago Press.
No context found.
Mead, G., Mind Self and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC