| Burzio, L. (1998). Multiple Correspondence. Lingua 104: 79-109. |
....on sip is just two syllables apart from the main accent on Del here. The QR thus prefers a secondary accent on the first syllable of the phrase and indeed the phrase often is pronounced as Mssissippi Dlta. In this case a conflict arises between the QR and an output output correspondence rule (cf. Burzio, 1998) which prefers, on the basis of Mississppi, the accent to fall on the penultimate syllable. In fast speech the QR is dominant. 14) OT analysis constraints Mississippi Delta candidates QR Correspondence ) Mssissippi Dlta Mississppi Dlta The QR divides language in a kind of 4 4 ....
....for andante speech the correspondence constraint PARSE#1 is higher ranked than in allegro speech. OUTPUT OUTPUT CORRESPONDENCE (O O CORR) constraints 6 The syllable stel can form a foot on the base of its bimoraicity (cf. Gilbers and Jansen 1996) relate the output to related outputs (cf. Burzio 1998; Jansen 1996) 7 The output ftotestel with secondary stress on the penult is preferred, because of the correspondence with the related output testel. This output satisfies O O CORR, whereas an output ftotoestl, with final secondary stress violates O O CORR. In the andante grammar, O O CORR ....
Burzio, L. (1998). Multiple Correspondence. Lingua 104: 79-109.
....in codas in forms derived by glide formation, but never in underived forms. We find that it is not possible to derive this pattern with a simple ranking of markedness and faithfulness constraints. But the variety of constraints sometimes called output to output correspondence (Benua 1995, 1997; Burzio 1996; Kager 1996, 1999; Steriade 1996; Kenstowicz 1997) which forces uniformity of phonological properties through the paradigm, suffices. The idea is that the ban on glottal stop in coda is outranked by MAX OO(#) but outranks MAX IO(#) What this means is that if ### occurs on the surface of some ....
Burzio, Luigi. 1996. Multiple correspondence. Ms. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
....considerations, point to the conclusion that, in general, grammatical optimization needs to be performed at the level of the paradigm. In a variety of contexts (e.g. cyclic effects ) phonological explanation seems to require identity of the expression of a morpheme across its paradigm: what Burzio (1993, 1994, 1995ab, 1996) has termed anti allomorphy, or in other terms, FAITHFULNESS constraints holding between pairs of outputs in the same paradigm (Benua 1995, Buckley 1995, Flemming and Kenstowicz 1995, Kenstowicz 1994, 1995, McCarthy 1995, Gafos 1996) We ll call such constraints OO FAITH for output output ....
Burzio, Luigi. 1996. Multiple correspondence. Ms., Johns Hopkins. To appear in Proceedings of the BCN Workshop on Conflicting Constraints, Groningen.
No context found.
Burzio, L. (1996b) `Multiple Correspondence' ms. Johns Hopkins.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC