| H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry. RFC 3449, Internet Engineering Task Force, Dec. 2002. |
....limitations of TCP is that there is no congestion control for the acknowledgements sent by the receiver to the sender. Ack congestion control can be useful any time there is congestion on the reverse path, but is particularly important for bandwidthasymmetric networks or packet radio subnetworks [1]. DCCP, unlike TCP, can detect reverse path congestion using per packet sequence numbers, and respond to it as appropriate. In CCID 2, the DCCP sender responds by modifying the Ack Ratio, which controls the rate of the acknowledgement stream from the receiver. The algorithm used to set the Ack ....
H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry. RFC 3449, Internet Engineering Task Force, Dec. 2002.
No context found.
Balakrishnan, H., Padmanabhan, V., Fairhurst, G. and M. Sooriyabandara, "TCP Performance Implications of Network Path Asymmetry", BCP 69, RFC 3449, December 2002.
No context found.
H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry. RFC 3449, Internet Engineering Task Force, Dec. 2002.
No context found.
H. Balakrishnan, V. N. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry. RFC 3449, Internet Engineering Task Force, Dec. 2002.
No context found.
H. Balakrishnan, V. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry. IETF RFC 3449, Dec. 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC