| T. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. BMVC, 2002. |
....inverse compositional algorithm also allows a different treatment of the appearance variation. Using the approach proposed in [Hager and Belhumeur, 1998] we project out the appearance variation thereby eliminating a great deal of computation. This modification is closely related to shape AAMs [Cootes and Kittipanya ngam, 2002]. Another feature that we include is shape normalization. The linear shape variation of AAMs is often augmented by combining it with a 2D similarity transformation to normalize the shape. We show how the inverse compositional algorithm can be used to simultaneously fit the combination of the two ....
....example, Active Appearance Models are just one instance in a large class of closely related linear shape and appearance models (and their associated fitting algorithms. This class contains Active Appearance Models (AAMs) Cootes et al. 2001, Cootes et al. 1998, Lanitis et al. 1997] Shape AAMs [Cootes and Kittipanya ngam, 2002], Active Blobs [Sclaroff and Isidoro, 1998] Morphable Models [Vetter and Poggio, 1997, Jones and Poggio, 1998,Blanz and Vetter, 1999] and Direct Appearance Models [Hou et al. 2001] as well as possibly others. Many of these models were proposed independently in 1997 1998 [Lanitis et al. ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In Proc. of BMVC, volume 2, pages 837--846, 2002.
....vector c i a pose parameter vector p i allowing control of scale, orientation and position of the synthesized face. While a couple of appearance parameter vector c and pose parameter vector p represents a face, the active appearance model can automatically adjust those parameters to a target face [9], by minimizing a residual image r(c, p) which is the texture difference between the synthesized face and the corresponding mask of the image it covers. For this purpose, a set of training residual images are computed by displacing the appearance and pose parameters whithin allowable limits. These ....
....These residuals are then used to compute matrices Ra and R t establishing the linear relationships #(c) Ra r(c, p) and #(p) R t r(c, p) between the parameter displacements and the corresponding residuals, so as to minimize r( c, p) #(c,p) 2 . An iterative model refinement procedure [9] is then used to drive the appearance model towards the actual face in the image. In the following, the appearance and pose parameters obtained by this optimization procedure will be denoted respectively as cop and pop . 2.2. Experimental setup The appearance model is built using the CMU ....
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. BMVC, 2002.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In British Machine Vision Conference, pages 837--846, Cardiff University, September 2002.
No context found.
T. F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, volume 2.
No context found.
T.F.Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing Variations on the Active Appearance Model Algorithm, Proc. BMVC2002, Vol.2, pp.837-846.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T. F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, volume 2.
No context found.
T.F. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam, "Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm," in British Machine Vision Conference, Cardiff University, September 2002, pp. 837--846.
No context found.
T.F.Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing Variations on the Active Appearance Model Algorithm, Proc. BMVC2002, Vol.2, pp.837-846.
No context found.
T. Cootes and P. Kittipanya-ngam. Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, volume 2, pages 837-- 846, 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC