R. Booth. the logic of iterated non-prioritised revision. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Conditionals, Information and Inference. Hagen, Germany, 2002. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
On iterated revision in the AGM framework - Herzig, Konieczny, Perrussel (Correct)
....beliefs then the resulting belief set is maximal. These impossibility results about iterated revision in the usual AGM framework can be seen as a justification for the increase in representational complexity that shows up when one goes from AGM to iterated belief revision frameworks (see e.g. [7, 15, 18, 13, 17, 4]) Instead of flat belief sets (alias sets of interpretations) the latter work with epistemic states, that can be represented by preorders on interpretations. The paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we give some definitions and notations. In section 3 we consider the Darwiche and ....
R. Booth. On the logic of iterated non-prioritised revision. In Workshop on Conditionals, Information and Inference. Hagen, Germany, 2002.
A Logical Approach for Describing (Dis)Belief Change and.. - Perrussel, Thevenin (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
R. Booth. the logic of iterated non-prioritised revision. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Conditionals, Information and Inference. Hagen, Germany, 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC