B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge (1999). Collective Motivational Attitudes in Cooperative Problem Solving. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-99),pp. 22-41. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
A Tuning Machine for Cooperative Problem Solving - Dunin-Keplicz, Verbrugge (2001) Self-citation (Dunin-keplicz Verbrugge) (Correct)
No context found.
Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving, Proceedings of the First International Workshop of Eastern and Central Europe on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS'99) (V. Gorodetsky, Ed.), St. Petersburg, 1999.
Evolution of Collective Commitment during Teamwork - Dunin-Keplicz, Verbrugge (2003) Self-citation (Dunin-keplicz Verbrugge) (Correct)
No context found.
Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving, Proceedings of the First International Workshop of Eastern and Central Europe on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS'99) (V. Gorodetsky, Ed.), St. Petersburg, 1999.
Creating Collective Intention - Through Dialogue Frank Self-citation (Verbrugge) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Dunin-Keplicz en R. Verbrugge, Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving. In: V. Gorodetsky et al. (eds.), Proceedings of The First International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS'99), St. Petersburg, 1999, pp. 22-41.
Creating Collective Intention through Dialogue - Dignum (2000) (11 citations) Self-citation (Verbrugge) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Dunin-Keplicz en R. Verbrugge, Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving. In: V. Gorodetsky et al. (eds.), Proceedings of The First International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS'99), St. Petersburg, 1999, pp. 22--41.
Creating Collective Intention Through Dialogue - Frank Dignum Barbara (2000) (11 citations) Self-citation (Dunin-keplicz Verbrugge) (Correct)
....in the presented account concerning the phase of team formation, social and collective commitments do not play a role: they become of importance at further stages of plan generation and team action. For this reason they are not defined here. The interested reader may find them in other papers (cf. [12, 14]) For similar reasons there is no stress on actions in this paper. 2.1 The logical language Individual actions and formulas are defined inductively, both with respect to a fixed finite set of agents. The basis of the induction is given in the following definition. Definition 1 (Language) The ....
....using a small model theorem. 3.2 Collective intentions To model teamwork, individual attitudes naturally do not suffice. In other work we discussed the pairwise notion of social commitments, as well as collective notions like collective belief, collective intention, and collective commitment [14]. In the first two stages of CPS, the essential notions are those of collective belief and collective intention. The definition of collective intention is rather strong, because we focus on strictly cooperative groups. There, a necessary condition for a collective intention is that all members of ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving. In: V. Gorodetsky et al. (eds.), Proceedings of The First International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS'99), St. Petersburg, 1999, pp. 22--41.
Collective Intentions - Dunin-Keplicz (2002) Self-citation (Dunin-keplicz Verbrugge) (Correct)
....while collective commitments are related to plan based team actions. The essential characteristics of both types of commitments is that they directly lead to action execution. As commitments are not the subject of this paper, we refer the reader to our other papers concerning commitments, e.g. [12]. In our work on collective intentions, the objective is two fold. First, to formally characterize what it means for a team to have a collective intention towards a common goal (represented for example as a state of the world to be achieved) This characterization will be done using multi modal ....
....more complex. Collective intention helps the team to monitor its behaviour during teamwork: even if some members drop their individual intentions, the team replans, aiming that the collective intention is ultimately realized. The precise description of this reconfiguration process can be found in [12, 13], where an agent s pro activeness and reactiveness are implicitly or explicitly involved on consecutive stages of the reconfiguration algorithm. 3. Preliminaries As mentioned before, we propose the use of multi modal logics to formalize agents informational and motivational attitudes as well as ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving, Proceedings of the First International Workshop of Eastern and Central Europe on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS'99) (V. Gorodetsky, Ed.), St. Petersburg, 1999.
On Commitments, Roles and Obligations - Fasli (2001) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge (1999). Collective Motivational Attitudes in Cooperative Problem Solving. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-99),pp. 22-41.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC