MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, Whole no. 1, pp. 1-123.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....the target morphology have not yet been acquired by these young children. Research on early child grammar does however shows that children of this age and younger have access to primitive morphological operations, although these are not necessarily target like (Dressler, 1994; Fee Ingram, 1982; MacWhinney, 1978). Given the assumption then that all constraints are universally available in their general form, it can be argued that children link BT Identity to a primitive operation of word truncation. Under this view, the task of the child is seen to be one of learning the relevant grammatical operation in ....

MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

....in detail by Barton, Berwick and Ristad 1987, p. 115 186, using the analysis of spies spy s in the KIMMO system. 11 See Lorenz Schueller 1994. 12 In the case of irregular paradigms, also the suppletive forms are supplied. 13 Thus, no bound morphemes (cf. 2.4) are being postulated. 14 MacWhinney 1978 demonstrates the independent status of lexical allomorphs with language acquisition data in Hungarian, Finnish, German, English, Latvian, Russian, Spanish, Arabic, and Chinese. 8 Concatenation takes place on the level of analyzed allomorphs by means of combirules. This method is in concord with ....

MacWhinney, B. (1978) The Acquisition of Morphophonology, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, No. 174, Vol. 43.

....grammar. Models incorporating this approach, in addition to those discussed above, include Anderson s later model, ACT (Anderson 1983) and the Competition Model (MacWhinney Anderson 1986, MacWhinney 1987) which combines ACT with MacWhinney s earlier model of the acquisition of morphophonology (MacWhinney 1978). 3. 2. 1. 4. The Hybrid Innatist Lexical Approach L.PARSIFAL (Berwick Weinberg 1984, Berwick 1985) can be seen to incorporate elements of both the innatist and lexical approaches outlined above. Syntactic category information is assumed insofar as words in input sentences are labelled with ....

MacWhinney, B. (1978), The acquisition of morphophonology, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43(1/2), pp.1-122.

....with a novel polymorphemic word one representing an unfamiliar combination of familiar morphemes she may be able to interpret the word by using the morphological rule that she has learned. 6 For a more thorough discussion of many of the issues involved in the acquisition of morphology, see MacWhinney (1978) 3.4 Learning to Produce Words Though it will not be the major focus of this paper, I will also consider what might be involved in learning to produce words since this will have a bearing on how the learning of receptive morphology takes place. Suppose the child is faced with the task of ....

....apply in the recognition direction, they are in a position to evaluate their production output by comparing the semantic output of the recognition process with the original intent behind their production. This mechanism is a part of the symbolic model of morphological acquisition described in MacWhinney (1978). In this case, however, there is still no target for production. What is available rather is some measure of how correct the output was. This would thus be an instance of reinforcement learning (Hertz et al. 1991) which is considerably less powerful than the supervised learning which ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43(1--2, Serial No. 174).

....of common sequences that incorporate more than one word, but which co occur frequently enough to be treated as a quasi unit. This is the sort of behavior observed in children, who at early stages of language acquisition may treat idioms and other formulaic phrases as fixed lexical items (MacWhinney, 1978). This simulation should not be taken as a model of word acquisition. While listeners are clearly able to make predictions based on partial input (Marslen Wilson Tyler, 1980; Grosjean, 1980; Salasoo Pisoni, 1985) prediction is not the major goal of the language learner. Furthermore, the ....

MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, No. 1.

No context found.

MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, Whole no. 1, pp. 1-123.

.... some Australian examples) Attempting to learn morphology in languages with rich morphology raises quite different problems from those discussed in the work above, issues discussed if rather naively and unsatisfactorily from a computational viewpoint in earlier work such as Pinker (1984) MacWhinney (1978) and Peters (1983) Foremost among these is the segmentation problem of how one cuts the complex morphological forms into bits with meanings identified. Note that I assume here that the child has already figured out the meanings of words. This is a big assumption, but it is reasonable for a model ....

....the learning problem and at any rate the learning task is still much broader and more realistic than that attempted by the recent English past tense literature. It may not even be unrealistic; see Pinker (1984:29 30) for a general defense of assuming some form of semantic bootstrapping and MacWhinney (1978:70 71) who for arguments for the learning of word meanings before gaining a productive understanding of them ( it appears that the use of inflections in amalgams is stabilized semantically before these amalgams are analyzed morphologically ) Thus the learning task which I am attempting to ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

MacWhinney, B. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC