G. Antoniol, G. Canfora, G. Casazza, A. De Lucia, and E. Merlo. Tracing object-oriented code into functional requirements. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, pages 227--230. Limerick, Ireland, June 2000. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
RIPPLES: Tool for Change in Legacy Software - Chen (2001) (1 citation) (Correct)
....of documents retrieved . Both recall and precision are between 0 and 1. Researchers have recently used recall and precision in evaluating effectiveness of software tools. Koschke, etc. 15] used them for experimental evaluation of clustering techniques for component recovery. Antoniol, etc. [1] also used recall and precision to evaluate the performance of their tool, that maintains traceability links between source code and free text documents. Software browsers [13, 20] extract and graphically represent program dependencies. However they do not support the process of the change and ....
G. Antoniol, G. Canfora, G. Casazza, A. De Lucia, E. Merlo, "Tracing Object-Oriented Code into Functional Requirements", Proc. of International Workshop for Program Comprehension (IWPC)'2000, pp. 79-86.
Recovering Documentation-to-Source-Code Traceability Links.. - Marcus, Maletic (Correct)
....were used to define a cohesion metric for components. The work presented here extends these results in a new direction. At the same time, Antoniol et al. 2 4] investigated the use oflR methods to support the traceability recovery process. In particular, they used both a probabilistic method [3, 4] and a vector space model [2] to recover links between source code and documentation, and between source code and requirements. Their results were promising in each case. Additionally this work also supports the choice of vector space models over probabilistic IR. Using LSI makes the work ....
....the 100 recall target was reached faster than in the case of LEDA, with better precision. The explanation is that, unlike in the LEDA case, the uses of classes by each other are less intensive in Albergate. Figure 3 shows graphically how our results compare with those obtained by Antoniol et al. [2, 3]. Remember that this time the setup of the experiments and the benchmark mapping are almost identical. The results are very close the only significant difference is that using LSI the 100 recall is reached one step sooner (selecting the top 6 ranked pairs, rather than 7) One more thing to note ....
Antoniol, G., Canfora, G., Casazza, G., De Lucia, A., and Mefio, E., "Tracing Object-Oriented Code into Functional Requirements", in Proceedings 8th Intemational Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC'00), Limerick, Ireland, June 10-11 2000, pp. 79- 87.
Traceability Recovery in RAD Software Systems - Di Penta Gradara (2002) Self-citation (Antoniol) (Correct)
No context found.
G. Antoniol, G. Canfora, G. Casazza, A. De Lucia, and E. Merlo. Tracing object-oriented code into functional requirements. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, pages 227--230. Limerick, Ireland, June 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC