| T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. |
....between busses is refined by introducing bus protocol timing. Therefore, the architecture model is timing accurate in terms of both computation and communication. 3. EXPERIMENTS We have applied the system level abstraction semantics to several system level design languages including SystemC [7, 11] and SpecC [5, 14] In order to represent the di#erent models in a language, each model concept was translated into one or more language constructs. For example, specification behaviors map to processes in SystemC or behaviors in SpecC. Ideally, the mapping of model concepts to language constructs ....
T. Grotker et al. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
..... 22 8. Overall Comparison 22 9. Conclusion 24 ii List of Figures 1 System modeling graph . 2 2 Comparison of defined abstraction models with models in [5] and [7] . 3 3 System design flow . 4 4 The general flow of synthesis task . 4 5 ....
....modeling at all the levels of abstraction, from purely functional un timed model to the cycle accurate RTL ISS model. 2. It models should be simulatable, so that functionality and timing constraints of a design can be validated . Among contemporary system level design languages, SystemC[9][7], SpecC[5] 10] and System verilog[3] are most prominent. SystemC is a C class library based language, while SpecC is a super set extending ANSI C. Both SystemC and SpecC qualify for the purpose with respect to the above two attributes. System Verilog is a high level abstraction extension of ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Thorstn Grotker, Stan Liao, Grant Martin, and Stuart Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
....order between busses is refined by introducing bus protocol timing. Therefore, the architecture model is timing accurate in terms of both computation and communication. 3 Experiments We have applied the system level abstraction semantics to several system level design languages including SystemC [16, 17] and SpecC [13, 14, 15] In order to represent the different models in a language, each model concept was translated into one or more language constructs. For example, specification behaviors map to processes in SystemC or behaviors in SpecC. Ideally, the mapping of model concepts to language ....
T. Grotker et al. System Design with SystemC.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
....of system on chips (SoCs) the design abstraction has been raised to the system level to increase productivity. System level design enables making design decisions at higher levels of abstraction and reusing design components. Recently, there has been interest in transaction level modeling [4][8] for system abstraction. In the transaction level model(TLM) the details of communication among computation components are separated from the details of the implementation of computation components. Communication is modelled as channels and transaction requests take place by calling interface ....
....defines construct channel, which enables separating communication from computation. It proposes four well defined models at different abstraction levels in a top down design flow. Some of these models can be classified as TLMs. However, the capabilities of TLMs are not stressed. Grotker et al. [8] broadly define the TLM features and present some design examples. However, the definition of TLM is too general and the usages of TLM in the existing design approaches are not addressed. 4] 8] also demonstrate that both SpecC and SystemC support transaction level modeling using the construct ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Thorstn Grotker et al. System design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, S. Swan, "System Design with SystemC", Kluwer, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, S. Swan, System Design with SystemC, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, G. Martin, S. Liao, and S.Swan, System Design with System-C, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.
No context found.
Grotker, T., et al., System Design with SystemC,Kluwer, 2002
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, S. Swan, "System Design with SystemC", Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S.Liao, G.Martin, S.Swan, System Design with SystemC, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
No context found.
T. Grotker, S. Liao, G. Martin, and S. Swan. System Design with SystemC. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, May 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC