| J. McGrenere, R.M. Baecker and K.S. Booth, "An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software", in ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM CHI Letters, Minneapolis, MN, 2002, pp. 163#/170. |
....high. Since most repetitive tasks are short, it is often easier to do them manually and avoid the cognitive load of complex customization. Others have found similar results users customize relatively little [Mackay, 1991] perhaps because customization facilities are complex themselves [McGrenere et al. 2002] . We conjecture that widespread PBD adoption requires automatic segmentation, and the adaptation mechanisms, described in the next section, may provide this capability. 4 Adapting to User Behavior The AI community has a long standing interest in adaptive interfaces. The Calendar s Apprentice ....
....is darkened. users become accustomed to changes in the dynamic area, these changes don t disturb their conceptual model [Norman, 1998] And because existing navigational patterns remain unchanged, users maintain control even if adaptation is unhelpful. The alternative, dual interface approach of [McGrenere et al. 2002] shares many benefits with partitioned dynamicity, but trades convenience for screen real estate. 4.3 Example: Adapting Desktop Dialogs We believe that the PROTEUS architecture, developed for adaptive websites, would be even more useful in a desktop application setting. As a story board example, ....
J. McGrenere, R. M. Baecker, and K. S. Booth. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. CHI-02, 2002.
....word processor and the web browser are getting more complex. They proposed a personal interface adaptable by the user with an easy to understand adaptation mechanism. Their system keeps the user in control by providing an adaptable interface, which can be personalized based on the user s need. [8] Their idea is similar to the manual strategy presented in this paper. However, menus and toolbars do not grow as users use the application like file systems that get bigger as users use their machines. Menus are no match for file system structure in size. Furthermore, their customization process ....
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R., Booth, K. S. An Evaluation of a Multiple Interface Design Solution for Bloated Software. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02), 2002, pp. 163-170
No context found.
J. McGrenere, R. Baecker, and K. Booth. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. In Proceedings ACM CHI 2002.
No context found.
J. McGrenere, R.M. Baecker and K.S. Booth, "An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software", in ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM CHI Letters, Minneapolis, MN, 2002, pp. 163#/170.
No context found.
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R., & Booth, K. (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. ACM CHI. p.163-170.
No context found.
J. McGrenere, R. M. Baecker, and K. S. Booth, "An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, 2002, pp. 164 -- 170.
No context found.
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. & Booth, K. (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software, In Proceedings of CHI'02 Human Factors in Computing Systems, 163-170, ACM, New York.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC