| L. Cottrell, "Frequently asked questions about Mixmaster remailers," http://www.obscura.com/~loki/remailer/mixmaster-faq.html (2000). |
....be able to determine the sender or the recipient, but not both at the same time. For k 2, the lineup of plausible sender recipient pairs should contain at least k candidates. No system that we are aware of provides this form of anonymity alone. There are systems, e.g. Mixmaster type remailers [Cot96], that provide stronger anonymity guarantees, which imply k value opaqueness for sr, among other properties. 2. absolute value opaqueness of sender recipient function sr : M A A. Equivalent to absolute sender and absolute recipient anonymity. 3. t) value opaqueness of sender recipient ....
....the corresponding property. The predicates are listed in Table 2. Figure 2 shows implications between the various anonymity properties. A solid arrow denotes implication, a dashed arrow conjunction. A common design is based on Chaum s MIX nets [Cha81] and involves a network of anonymizing servers [Dai95, Cot96, SGR97]. This approach provides identity protection in a situation where the Big Brother attacker may observe traffic on the wires connecting everyone s computer to the network, but all communications are encrypted and travel through a secure server(s) which blends them together and distributes to ....
L. Cottrell. Frequently asked questions about Mixmaster remailers, 1996. http://www.obscura.com/loki/remailer/ mixmaster-faq.html.
No context found.
L. Cottrell, "Frequently asked questions about Mixmaster remailers," http://www.obscura.com/~loki/remailer/mixmaster-faq.html (2000).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC