| J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In Procs. of EurAsia ICT 2002, LNCS 2510, pages 677--684. Springer, 2002. |
No context found.
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In Procs. of EurAsia ICT 2002, LNCS 2510, pages 677--684. Springer, 2002.
No context found.
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In Procs. of EurAsia ICT 2002, LNCS 2510, pages 677--684. Springer, 2002.
No context found.
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In Proceedings of The First Eurasian Conference on Advances in Information and Communication Technology (EurAsia ICT 2002.
....ordering among states is lost. Finally, the information about the selected goal states is represented by dichotomous values (0 1) an agent can intend to reach a state or not. Note that the BDI systems can be extended with either qualitative orderings for likelihood and desirability of beliefs [3], or even with quantitative probabilities and utilities [13] A decision theoretic view of BDI theory extends the dichotomous abstraction of qualitative decision theory with the additional deliberative component, i.e. the intentions, to stabilize decision making behavior of the agent. Unlike ....
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In Proceedings of The First Eurasian Conference on Advances in Information and Communication Technology (EurAsia ICT 2002), volume 2510 of LNCS, pages 677--684. Springer, 2002.
No context found.
J.M. Broersen, M. Dastani, Z. Huang, and L.W.N. van der Torre. Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In H. Shafazand and A. Min Tjoa, editors, Eurasia-ICT 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC