| G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the cost-effectiveness of regression testing. In Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., May 2002. |
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the cost-effectiveness of regression testing. In Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the costeffectiveness of regression testing. In Proc. 24th Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., pages 130--140, May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the cost-effectiveness of regression testing. In Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the cost-effectiveness of regression testing. In Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., May 2002.
....prior to execution, attempting to help testing objectives be met earlier during testing. Henceforth, for brevity, we shall usually refer to these techniques simply as selection, reduction, and prioritization, respectively. The foregoing techniques can be beneficial to testers. Experiments [9, 15, 19, 21] show that reduction can be very effective in reducing test suite size. Other experiments [2, 8, 9, 15, 17] show that selection can effectively reduce the number of tests that must be rerun. Still other experiments [5, 6, 20] show that prioritization can allow test suites to detect faults earlier ....
....brevity, we shall usually refer to these techniques simply as selection, reduction, and prioritization, respectively. The foregoing techniques can be beneficial to testers. Experiments [9, 15, 19, 21] show that reduction can be very effective in reducing test suite size. Other experiments [2, 8, 9, 15, 17] show that selection can effectively reduce the number of tests that must be rerun. Still other experiments [5, 6, 20] show that prioritization can allow test suites to detect faults earlier in testing than would otherwise be possible, allowing engineers to address those faults earlier. Such ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the costeffectiveness of regression testing. In Proc. 24th Int'l. Conf. Softw. Eng., pages 130--140, May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the costeffectiveness of regression testing. In Proceedings ICSE-24, pages 230--240, May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the costeffectiveness of regression testing. In Proceedings ICSE-24, pages 230--240, May 2002.
No context found.
G. Rothermel, S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, P. Kallakuri, and B. Davia. The impact of test suite granularity on the costeffectiveness of regression testing. In Proceedings ICSE-24, pages 230--240, may 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC