Bartek Kiepuszewski, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of control flow in workflows. Acta Inf., 39(3):143--209, 2003. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language - van der Aalst, Hofstede (2003) (15 citations) Self-citation (Hofstede Van der aalst) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Patterns and XPDL: A Critical Evaluation of the XML Process.. - van der Aalst (2003) (3 citations) Self-citation (Van der aalst) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Design and implementation of the YAWL system - Van Der Aalst (2004) (5 citations) Self-citation (Hofstede Van der aalst) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Challenges in Business Process Management: Verification of.. - van der Aalst Self-citation (Van der aalst) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Design and implementation of the YAWL system - van der Aalst, Aldred, Dumas.. (2004) (5 citations) Self-citation (Hofstede Van der aalst) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Business Process Management: A Survey - van der Aalst, Hofstede, Weske (2003) (3 citations) Self-citation (Hofstede Van der aalst) (Correct)
....that alternative interpretations are ruled out. After consensus among the stakeholders has been reached, a business process model can be deployed and if a formal language was used, its behavior can be explained in terms of the formal semantics of that specification language. As remarked in [21], the lack of a formal semantics has resulted in di#erent interpretations by vendors of even basic control flow constructs, definitions in natural language such as provided by the Workflow Management Coalition are not precise enough. As always, it is preferable to identify any problems in software ....
....is important that such relations are fully formalized. Formally defined Business Process Modeling Languages can be compared in terms of their expressive power. For some classes of workflow modeling languages, abstractions of some existing approaches, comparative expressiveness has been studied in [21, 20]. These results are in the context of a specific notion of equivalence, addressing the issue of when two workflow models can be considered expressing the same workflow. Expressiveness results give insight into what can and cannot be expressed in some approaches and more research is needed in this ....
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. QUT Technical report, FIT-TR2002 -03, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2002. (Also see http://www.tm.tue.nl/it/research/patterns.) Also appeared in Acta Informatica.
YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language - van der Aalst, Hofstede (2002) (15 citations) Self-citation (Hofstede Van der aalst) (Correct)
.... 16 (def c) 17 (int par) 18 (milest) 19 (can a) 20 (can c) Table 1. The main results for Staffware, COSA, InConcert, Eastman, FLOWer, Lotus Domino Workflow, Meteor, and Mobile. In [29, 30] a classification of workflows is presented based on the concepts supported, the evaluation strategy used, and the syntactic restrictions imposed. In [29] four classes of workflow modelling languages are distinguished: 1. Standard Workflow Models. These essentially correspond to workflow ....
.... Workflow Models essentially form a subclass of Free Choice Petri nets [12] Hence Standard Workflow Models do not support advanced forms of synchroFIT nization such as present in Pattern 7 (Synchronizing Merge) and Pattern 9 (Discriminator) which were proven to be inherently non free choice [29, 30]. In addition, while Free Choice Petri nets support the concept of state, and can deal with e.g. Pattern 16 (Deferred Choice) Standard Workflow Models were shown not to be able to deal with this pattern. Safe Workflow Models are less expressive than Standard Workflow Models. While this is not ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2002-03, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2002. (Also see http://www.tm.tue.nl/it/research/patterns.) To appear in Acta Informatica.
Experiences in enhancing existing BPM Tools with BPEL.. - Mendling, Lassen, Zdun (2006) (Correct)
No context found.
Bartek Kiepuszewski, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of control flow in workflows. Acta Inf., 39(3):143--209, 2003.
On the Translation between BPMN and BPEL: Conceptual.. - Recker, Mendling (2006) (Correct)
No context found.
Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. Acta Informatica 39 (2003) 143--209
Pi calculus versus Petri nets: Let us eat "humble pie" rather.. - van der Aalst (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter HofXXF23 and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows. ActaInfo.8d)fl a, 39(3):143--209, 2003.
Medical services workflows with BPEL4WS - Anzböck, Dustdar (Correct)
No context found.
Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows (2002)
Modeling Ad-Hoc Medical Imaging Workflows with BPEL4WS - Anzböck, Dustdar, Gholami (Correct)
No context found.
Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows (2002)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC