| A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. "potential costs and bene ts of long-term prefetching for content-distribution". In Proceedings of the 2001. |
No context found.
A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. "potential costs and bene ts of long-term prefetching for content-distribution". In Proceedings of the 2001.
No context found.
A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. "potential costs and bene ts of longterm prefetching for content-distribution". In Proceedings of the 2001.
....close to a client before the client accesses them. Hoarding, a form of prefetching in which a user identi es groups of objects to fetch, is e ective for disconnected operation in le systems [19] and the Microsoft Internet Explorer browser implements a hoarding option for web pages. Server push [13, 20, 40] such as the content distribution networks becoming commercially available can be thought of as a form of server directed prefetching. Note that prefetching is more aggressive than the push update approach described in the previous paragraph. Push update only distributes new versions 14 ....
A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. "potential costs and bene ts of longterm prefetching for content-distribution". In Proceedings of the 2001.
....little spare capacity, we observe that a threshold based prefetching scheme causes response times to increase by a factor of 2 due to interference, whereas prefetching using NPS decreases response times by 25 . 1 Introduction A number of studies have demonstrated the bene ts of web prefetching [12, 17, 24, 25, 32, 33, 42, 52]. And the attractiveness of prefetching appears likely to rise in the future as the falling prices of disk storage [14] and network bandwidth [41] make it increasingly attractive to trade increased consumption of these resources to improve response time and availability and thus reduce human wait ....
....consumption provides incrementally better service. For example, a prefetching system can improve hit rate and hence response times by fetching objects from a virtually unlimited collection of objects that have non zero probabilities of access [5, 8] or by updating cached copies more frequently [10, 50, 52]. Interference can occur at any of the critical resources in the system. Server: Prefetching consumes extra resources on the server such as processing time, memory space and disk. Network: Prefetching causes extra data packets to be transmitted over the network, potentially increasing ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. The Potential Costs and Bene ts of Long Term Prefetching for Content Distribution. In Sixth Web Caching and Content Distribution Workshop, June 2001.
....server trace, our system reduces the average demand request response times by 25 in comparison to a prefetching scheme that uses same prediction techniques and traditional techniques for limiting interference. 1 Introduction A number of studies have demonstrated the bene ts of Web prefetching [13, 18, 27, 28, 35, 36, 43, 53]. And the attractiveness of prefetching appears likely to rise in the future as the falling prices of disk storage [15] and network bandwidth [8, 42] make it increasingly attractive to trade increased disk storage and network bandwidth consumption for improved response time and availability. ....
....incrementally better service. For example, the prefetching system can improve its hit rate and hence the response times, by fetching objects from a virtually unlimited collection of objects that have non zero probability of access [6, 9] or by updating cached copies more frequently as data change [11, 51, 53]. Interference can occur at any of the critical resources in the system. Server: Prefetching consumes extra resources on the server such as CPU time, memory space and disk I Os. Network: Prefetching causes extra data packets to be transmitted over the Internet and hence consumes network ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
A. Venkataramani, P. Yalagandula, R. Kokku, S. Sharif, and M. Dahlin. The Potential Costs and Bene ts of Long Term Prefetching for Content Distribution. In Proceedings of the 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC