Watkins, K., I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning and D. Walker, A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties, Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Computer Science Department., Carnegie Mellon University (2002). Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Relating State-Based and Process-Based Concurrency through.. - Cervesato, Scedrov (2006) Self-citation (Cervesato) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning and D. Walker, A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties, Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Computer Science Department., Carnegie Mellon University (2002).
Manifest Security for Distributed Information - Crary, Harper, Pfenning (2006) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
Avoiding Causal Dependencies via Proof Irrelevance in a.. - Ley-Wild, Pfenning (2006) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
A Concurrent Logical Framework: The Propositional.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. A Syntax and judgments of propositional CLF A; B; C ::= a j A B j A !B j A&B j > j fSg Asynchronous types S ::= S
Specifying Properties of Concurrent Computations in CLF - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2004) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning and D. Walker, A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties, Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (
Representing the MSR Cryptoprotocol Specification Language.. - Cervesato, Stehr (2005) Self-citation (Cervesato) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning, and D. Walker: 2003, `A Concurrent Logical Framework I: Judgments and Properties'. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
Representing the MSR Cryptoprotocol Specification Language in .. - Cervesato, al. (2004) Self-citation (Cervesato) (Correct)
No context found.
K. Watkins, I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning, and D. Walker. A Concurrent Logical Framework I: Judgments and Properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003. 22
The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process.. - Cervesato (2004) (3 citations) Self-citation (Cervesato) (Correct)
No context found.
K. Watkins, I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning, and D. Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Computer Science Department. , Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
Contextual Model Type Theory - Nanevski, Pfenning, Pientka (2005) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., Cervesato, I., Pfenning, F., and Walker, D. 2002. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Revised May 2003.
Manifest Security for Distributed Information - Crary, Harper, Pfenning.. (2006) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
A Concurrent Logical Framework: The Propositional.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. 21 A Syntax and judgments of propositional CLF
CLF: A Dependent Logical Framework for Concurrent.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2004) (1 citation) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Revised May 2003.
Focusing the Inverse Method for Linear Logic - Chaudhuri, Pfenning (2005) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Carnegie Mellon University, March 2002. At: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/fp/papers/CMU-CS-02-101.pdf.
Monadic Concurrent Linear Logic Programming - Lopez, Pfenning, Polakow, Watkins (2005) Self-citation (Watkins Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
K. Watkins, I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning, and D. Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
Specifying Properties of Concurrent Computations in CLF - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2004) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., I. Cervesato, F. Pfenning and D. Walker, A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties, Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (
A Focusing Inverse Method Theorem Prover for First-Order.. - Chaudhuri, Pfenning (2005) Self-citation (Pfenning) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, K., Cervesato, I., Pfenning, F., Walker, D.: A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (2002) Revised May 2003.
CLF: A Dependent Logical Framework for Concurrent.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2004) (1 citation) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Revised May 2003.
A Concurrent Logical Framework: The Propositional.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. 21 A Syntax and judgments of propositional CLF
A Concurrent Logical Framework: the - Propositional Fragment Kevin Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
....central role of canonical forms by restricting the framework s syntax so that only canonical objects are well formed. Type directed substitution and expansion algorithms preserving the canonical forms property are de ned. Though the dependently typed variant of CLF has already been developed [WCPW02], the present discussion is restricted to the propositional fragment CLF 0 , which already exhibits the principal phenomena concerning concurrency. The use of the framework is illustrated by an encoding of Petri net computations because of their simplicity, but related representations for the ....
....these topics, however, is beyond the scope of the present paper. 3 Identity and Substitution Properties This section sketches the meta theory of the canonical formulation of CLF 0 . Additional details and a development of the dependent case may be found is the companion theory technical report [WCPW02]. For CLF0 it can be shown that the judgment E1 E2 is symmetric, hence one premise of the rule is redundant. However, plausible extensions of the language currently under investigation do not have this property, so we use the more general form given here. As discussed in Section 2, the CLF 0 ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Forthcoming.
A Concurrent Logical Framework II: Examples and.. - Cervesato, Pfenning.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
....nets and nally, the security protocol speci cation language MSR. Throughout the report we assume the reader is already familiar with the formal de nition of CLF. For detailed explanation and development of the type theory, please see A Concurrent Logical Framework I: Judgments and Properties [WCPW02]. Keywords: logical frameworks, type theory, linear logic, concurrency Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Concurrent Logical Framework CLF 4 2.1 Syntax . 4 2.2 Typing Judgments . ....
....of LLF can be overcome by extending the framework with a monad that incorporates the synchronous connectives , 1, and 9 of intuitionistic linear logic. We call this new framework Concurrent LF (CLF) Readers interested in the meta theory of CLF should read the precursor to this report [WCPW02], which explains the formulation of the framework and describes its typing judgments and properties in detail. Here, we review the syntax of CLF and state some fundamental properties of the framework (Section 2) However, we give no explanation of the typing rules. They are merely included as a ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Forthcoming. 84
A Concurrent Logical Framework II: Examples and.. - Cervesato, Pfenning.. (2002) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
....nets and finally, the security protocol specification language MSR. Throughout the report we assume the reader is already familiar with the formal definition of CLF. For detailed explanation and development of the type theory, please see A Concurrent Logical Framework I: Judgments and Properties [WCPW02]. Keywords: logical frameworks, type theory, linear logic, concurrency Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Concurrent Logical Framework CLF 4 2.1 Syntax . 4 2.2 Typing Judgments . ....
....the limitations of LLF can be overcome by extending the framework with a monad that incorporates the synchronous connectives# of intuitionistic linear logic. We call this new framework Concurrent LF (CLF) Readers interested in the meta theory of CLF should read the precursor to this report [WCPW02], which explains the formulation of the framework and describes its typing judgments and properties in detail. Here, we review the syntax of CLF and state some fundamental properties of the framework (Section 2) However, we give no explanation of the typing rules. They are merely included as a ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Forthcoming. 84
A Concurrent Logical Framework: The Propositional.. - Watkins, Cervesato.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Watkins Cervesato Pfenning Walker) (Correct)
....central role of canonical forms by restricting the framework s syntax so that only canonical objects are well formed. Type directed substitution and # expansion algorithms preserving the canonical forms property are defined. Though the dependently typed variant of CLF has already been developed [WCPW02], the present discussion is restricted to the propositional fragment CLF 0 , which already exhibits the principal phenomena concerning concurrency. The use of the framework is illustrated by an encoding of Petri net computations because of their simplicity, but related representations for the ....
....these topics, however, is beyond the scope of the present paper. 3 Identity and Substitution Properties This section sketches the meta theory of the canonical formulation of CLF 0 . Additional details and a development of the dependent case may be found is the companion theory technical report [WCPW02]. For CLF0 it can be shown that the judgment E1 E2 is symmetric, hence one premise of the rule is redundant. However, plausible extensions of the language currently under investigation do not have this property, so we use the more general form given here. As discussed in Section 2, the CLF ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Forthcoming.
Mechanizing Language Definitions - Harper, Licata (2006) (Correct)
No context found.
Watkins, Kevin, Cervesato, Iliano, Pfenning, Frank, , & Walker, David. (2002). A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Tech. rept. CMU-CS02 -101. Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Revised May 2003.
A Coq Library for Verification of Concurrent Programs - Affeldt, Kobayashi (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Kevin Watkins, Iliano Cervesato, Frank Pfenning, and David Walker. A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-101, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Mar. 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC