| Smart buildings admit their faults. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley, http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/ 1101smartbuildings.html, November 2001. |
....interference. Due to the relative ease of deployment of mote based sensor networks, practitioners in a variety of fields have begun considering them for a range of monitoring and data collection tasks. For example: civil engineers are using motes to monitor building integrity during earthquakes [1]; biologists are planning a mote deployment for habitat monitoring of Storm Petrels on Great Duck Island [14] off the coast of Maine; administrators of large computer clusters are interested in using motes to monitor the temperature and power usage in their data centers. Sensor applications ....
Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
....they want the network to sense [23] the ability to reprogram is invaluable. Our experiences working with civil engineers present similar issues in programming. By monitoring building structures with embedded motes, expensive tasks such as earthquake damage assessment can be made fast and simple [1]. Such a network would be very useful for a wide variety of tasks, such as water damage detection or sound propagation testing. As not all of these tasks would be anticipated, installing software for all of them at deployment time is impossible; additionally, as the network is embedded in the ....
Smart buildings admit their faults. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html, 2001.
No context found.
UC Berkeley. Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
No context found.
UC Berkeley. Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
No context found.
UC Berkeley. Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
No context found.
UC Berkeley. Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
....monitoring and data collection tasks. For example: civil engineers are using motes to monitor building integrity during earthquakes This work has been partially supported by the NSF under grants IIS 0086057 and SI0122599, and by research funds from IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and the UC Micro program. [31]; biologists are planning mote deployments for habitat monitoring[21, 5] administrators of large computer clusters are interested in using motes to monitor the temperature and power usage in their data centers. All of these sensor applications depend on the ability to extract data from the ....
UC Berkeley. Smart buildings admit their faults. Web Page, November 2001. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley. http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/1101.smartbuildings.html.
No context found.
Smart buildings admit their faults. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley, http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/ 1101smartbuildings.html, November 2001.
No context found.
Smart buildings admit their faults. Lab Notes: Research from the College of Engineering, UC Berkeley, http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/ 1101smartbuildings.html, November 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC