ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....being bottlenecked elsewhere) If other better information is available, Remos can use different sharing policies when estimating flow bandwidths. The basic sharing policy assumed by Remos corresponds to the max min fair share policy [17] which is the basis of ATM flow control for ABR traffic [19, 2], and is also used in other environments [15] 4.3 Logical network topology Remos supports queries about the network structure and topology in addition to queries about specific flows in the network. The reason we expose a network level view of connectivity is that certain types of questions are ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

....studied and deployed. These protocols typically allow the user to request one of a small number of service types, e.g. establishing a point to point connection or adding a receiver to a multicast connection. A recent example is the ATM signaling protocol standardized by the ITU and ATM forum [2]. RSVP [36] is an example of a signaling protocol that came out of the data networking community. It establishes multicast flows , which are weaker than connections, and allows the creation of filters that merge the reservations of multiple flows. Other efforts have defined and implemented ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document. 16

.... models and designing associated resource management mechanisms for both ATM and IP networks [8, 12, 27] This has resulted in specific QoS service models both for ATM [1] and IP [7, 31, 23] This has also resulted in the development of QoS routing protocols [3, 29, 21, 20] and signaling protocols [2, 3, 33]. A closely related issue being investigated in the IP community is link sharing [14] the problem of how organizations can share network resources in a preset way, while allowing the flexibility of distributing unused bandwidth to other users. Darwin differs from these efforts in several aspects. ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

.... models and designing associated resource management mechanisms for both ATM and IP networks [10, 14, 27] This has resulted in specific QoS service models both for ATM [1] and IP [7, 30, 22] This has also resulted in the development of QoS routing protocols [3, 28, 21, 20] and signaling protocols [2, 3, 32]. A closely related issue being investigated in the IP community is link sharing [15] the problem of how organizations can share network resources in a preset way, while allowing the flexibility of distributing unused bandwidth to other users. Darwin differs from these efforts in several aspects. ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

....being bottlenecked elsewhere) If other better information is available, Remos can use different sharing policies when estimating flow bandwidths. The basic sharing policy assumed by Remos corresponds to the max min fair share policy [16] which is the basis of ATM flow control for ABR traffic [18, 2], and is also used in other environments [14] 4.3 Logical network topology Remos supports queries about the network structure and topology in addition to queries about specific flows in the network. The reason we expose a network level view of connectivity is that certain types of questions are ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

....being bottlenecked elsewhere) If other better information is available, Remos can use different sharing policies when estimating flow bandwidths. The basic sharing policy assumed by Remos corresponds to the max min fair share policy [14] which is the basis of ATM flow control for ABR traffic [16, 1], and is also used in other environments [12] 4.3 Logical network topology Remos supports queries about the network structure and topology in addition to queries about specific flows in the network. The reason we expose a network level view of connectivity is that certain types of questions are ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

....(that are not bottlenecked elsewhere) If other information is available, Remos can use different sharing policies when estimating flow bandwidths. The basic sharing policy assumed by Remos corresponds to the max min fair share policy [11] which is the basis of ATM flow control for ABR traffic [13, 2], and is also used in other environments [9] Note that clients of the topology interface are responsible for accounting for sharing effects, both across application flows, and between application flows and other competing flows. This is one of the reasons to prefer the query interface over the ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

.... associated resource management mechanisms for both ATM and IP networks [11] 15] 30] This has resulted in specific QoS service models both for ATM [2] and IP [6] 34] 26] This has also resulted in the development of QoS routing protocols [4] 22] 21] 31] and signaling protocols [3], 4] 36] A closely related issue being investigated in the IP community is link sharing [17] the problem of how organizations can share network resources in a preset way, while allowing the flexibility of distributing unused bandwidth to other users. Both Darwin and the delegate mechanisms ....

ATM User-Network Interface Specification. Version 4.0, 1996. ATM Forum document.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC