E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, 1975.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....problems typically used in evolutionary optimization research. The results show that the additional fluctuations supply some advantage to particle swarm on sustainable development . 2. Standard particle swarm optimization (SPSO) The fundament to the development of PSO is a hypothesis [14] that social sharing of information among conspeciates offers an evolutionary advantage. PSO is similar to the other evolutionary algorithms in that the system is initialized with a population of random solutions. However, each potential solution is also assigned a randomized velocity, and the ....

E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology: the new synthesis, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975.

....to provide more robustly searching. A population of searching agents is introduced to assist the movement of particulates. Then the problem arises: how to schedule the execute times among searching agents reasonably Some rules can be observed underlie animal social behavior, including schools [4], flocks [5] and ants [6] and that of humans. As E. O. Wilson suggests [4] in reference to fish schooling, that social sharing of information among agents offers an evolutionary advantage, which has been make great success [5] 6] 4. A paradigm of PACA algorithm Definition 1: An energy point ....

....to assist the movement of particulates. Then the problem arises: how to schedule the execute times among searching agents reasonably Some rules can be observed underlie animal social behavior, including schools [4] flocks [5] and ants [6] and that of humans. As E. O. Wilson suggests [4], in reference to fish schooling, that social sharing of information among agents offers an evolutionary advantage, which has been make great success [5] 6] 4. A paradigm of PACA algorithm Definition 1: An energy point is located in search space S, which is described by the location X and its ....

E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology: the new synthesis, Belknap Press, MA, 1975

....are compared on three numerical optimization problems typically used in evolutionary optimization research. The preliminary results suggest that mass extinction can enhance the performance. 2. Standard particle swarm optimization (SPSO) The fundament to the development of PSO is a hypothesis [16] that socia l sharing of information among conspeciates offers an evolutionary advantage. PSO is similar to the other evolutionary algorithms in that the system is initialized with a population of random solutions. However, each potential solution is also assigned a randomized velocity, and the ....

E. O. Wilson. Sociobiology: the new synthesis, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975

....actuators can be replicated to produce a mechanical centipede with flexible joints between leg segments. The robot is intended for use as a research and educational platform to study computational sensors [3, 4] subsumption architectures [5] neural gait control [6] behavior of social insects [7], and machine vision [8] The robot may be powered and controlled through a tether, or autonomously with on board power supply and electronics [9] It is capable of carrying up to 50 grams while walking at a speed of 3 to 10 centimeters per minute over slightly textured surfaces such as ....

Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press.

....for joining a coalition is correlated with its political success. Let us consider a behavior taken as example by Wilson: heroism. In all cultures, heroes, i.e. individuals who prove their ability to perform courageous, though sometimes futile, acts, are conspicuously honored. Sociobiology (Wilson 1975, 1978) can only account for one part of the story: trying to appear as a hero is a profitable strategy since it provides a better access to resources and reproduction. Sociobiology cannot explain at all why other individuals, by honoring heroes, grant them with such essential advantages. Within ....

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press.

.... Their argumentation is based, e.g. on the successful experiment of Savage Rumbaugh [30] at teaching chimpanzees a basic lexicon, on the studies of parrots amazing ability of reproducing human speech [31] and that of whales complicated songs [32] For some insight into this debate, see e.g. [33, 34, 35]. for combinatorial association, which are then applied to map words and meanings and to produce combinations of words such as to satisfy any grammatical rules (rather than only a universal one) 34, 42, 43] The two above approaches give only a cognitivist account of language development. ....

E.O. Wilson. Sociobiology:the new synthesis. Social Sciences, 2nd edition, 1980.

....communication features in many insect cooperative mechanisms. An Architecture for Cooperation among Autonomous Agents. PhD Thesis David Jung 36 3.3. 2 SOCIAL INSECT SOCIETIES Of the social insect societies, the most thoroughly studied are those of ants, termites, bees and wasps [Wilson, 1971; Wilson, 1975; Crespi and Choe, 1997] Much of what has been learned has been applied to robotics (e.g. Srinivasan et al. 1995; Srinivasan et al. 1997] Ants display a large array of cooperative behaviours, only some of which are mentioned here. Ants, like bacteria, also utilise interaction via the ....

Wilson, E. O., "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis", Harvard, 1975.

....and Zhang with their collective box pushing system (Kube and Zhang, 1994) The second part of this paper will demonstrate that the result also holds for our system. 2.3. 2 Ants Of the social insect societies, the most thoroughly studied are those of ants, termites, bees and wasps (Wilson, 1971; Wilson, 1975; Crespi and Choe, 1997) Ants display a large array of cooperative behaviors. For example, as described in detail by Pasteels et al. Pasteels et al. 1987) upon discovering a new food source, a worker ant leaves a pheromone trail during its return to the nest. Recruited ants will follow this ....

Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard.

....Los Angeles, California 90024 boyd anthro.sscnet.ucla.edu Version 2.01 June, 1997. In press: I. Eibl Eibisfeldt and F. Salter, eds. Ideology, Warfare, and Indoctrinability. Please do not cite without authors permission. 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Human sociality in comparative perspective E.O. Wilson (1975) described humans as one of the four pinnacles of social evolution. The other pinnacles are the colonial invertebrates, the social insects, and the non human mammals. Wilson separated human sociality from that of the rest of the mammals because, with the exception of the social insect like Naked ....

....Allied victors grew more slowly because special interest organizations remained intact, demanding expensive and inefficient subsidies and other aid at the expense of the nation as a whole. 4.0 Genetic Group Selection Implausible Several prominent modern Darwinians [W.D. Hamilton (1975) E.O. Wilson (1975: 5612) R.D. Alexander (1987: 169) and Eibl Eibesfeldt (1982) have given serious consideration to group selection as a force in the special case of human ultra sociality. They are impressed, as we are, by the organization of human populations into units which engage in sustained, lethal combat ....

Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

....bacteria. We too, as multi cellular organisms, are a cooperative of differentiated cells that share many of the same mechanisms of chemical signaling with our bacterial ancestors. Of the social insect societies, the most thoroughly studied are those of ants, termites, bees and wasps [Wilson, 1971; Wilson, 1975; Crespi and Choe, 1997] Ants display a large array of cooperative behaviors. For example, as described in detail by Pasteels et al. Pasteels et al. 1987] upon discovering a new food source, a worker ant leaves a pheromone trail during its return to the nest. Recruited ants will follow this ....

Wilson, E. O., "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis", Harvard, 1975.

.... for kinship) and on which a whole branch of research is founded, the study of the evolution of cooperation (Axelrod Hamilton 1981) Note that this type of sociality resembles the vertebrate explicit sociality, rather than the insect eusociality, where societies are formed by differentiation (Wilson 1975). As already said, this choice has been made with the longer term aim to investigate whether higher level cognitive abilities may emerge out of reactive, pro social ones (point made by McFarland (1994) With these in mind, we quantified the original tit for tat model (Axelrod Hamilton 1981) in ....

....solve : all tit for tat agents would start by cooperating and the system would be stable. Finally, we are only considering the case 5 Sometimes, nature itself may be regarded as the play maker, who sets resources and other constraints ; real biological examples generally fall into this category (Wilson 1975). 7 where a( and b( are linear functions : a(x) a x and b(x) b x, though we could easily generalize. For agents to be considered as rational, a(T) b(T) should hold, whence a b . It follows that the three parameters of our affection model are T, a and b. Experiment 1 : Variations and ....

Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology - The new synthesis, Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975.

....hold in the modern robotics context. Before we consider an appropriate definition for robot cooperation we need to examine cooperative behaviour in humans and animals. As cooperation is a social phenomena we may look to sociology and social psychology for insight into its mechanisms [Tinbergen 53] Wilson 75] Wright 95] 3.1 The origins of Altruism Given that Charles Darwin s theory of natural selection implies that individuals behave in a completely selfish manner to increase their own fitness, an obvious question is why do biological organisms cooperate at all . This very question perplexed ....

Wilson, E. O., "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis", Harvard, 1975.

....such as 3 robots and 8 units. In all cases, persistence alone looks sufficient. If any specialization reveals necessary not in this case, anyway , then it will have to rely on more genetic causes, rather then on primitive autocatalytic processes, hence on more elaborate sociobiological models (Wilson 1975), rather than on blind reflexes such as autocatalysis. 7. DISCUSSION The above formulation and study of the adopted process control problem allows a number of interesting observations to be made: If the control system of the reactive robot is decomposed into a number of activities, or else tasks, ....

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology - The new synthesis, Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975.

....altruism and specialisation. All of these are observed in animal and human societies. But evolutionary selection does not seem to offer an explanation for these behaviours. To address this problem three extensions of natural selection have been proposed: kin selection [14] group selection [31] and reciprocal co operation [1] Although each offers explanations of some of the kinds of the social behaviours of interest neither seems to offer a general framework applicable to human or artificial social systems. Kin selection only applies to highly genetically related individuals, group ....

Wilson, E.: Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass (1975)

....has to do with the use of selective advantages as a necessary ingredient in defining communication. For instance, Wilson defines communication as the altering by one organism of the probability pattern of behavior in another organism in a manner adaptive to either one of them or to both [26]. Lewis and Gower define communication as the transmission of signals between two or more organisms where selection has favoured both the production and reception of the signal (s) 11] Burghardt defines it as a behavior that is likely to influence the receiver in a way that benefits, in a ....

E. O. Wilson. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.

....with absolutely no explicit communication between the robots. 3 Cooperation by Observation Many kinds of social animals, including humans, often show highly coordinated group behaviors without explicit communication. For example, some carnivores carry out group hunting successfully in silence [10]. In our everyday life, we routinely perform cooperative tasks without speaking, often without thinking. One typical example is that when someone carrying a large baggage with both hands approaches a closed door, a person near by would open the door. 3.1 Action Understanding The ability for ....

....grounded on action observation. Conversely, attention control in action observation process can be a candidate driving force in emergence of various social structures. Some examples of attentional structures are illustrated in Fig. 1. All of these have ground instances in animal societies [10]. The original notion of attentional structure describes purely social interactions. When a group of robots engage in a cooperative task, we must also consider physical interactions with other objects. a) b) c) d) e) f) Partnership Orders Loop Leadership Team Swarm : agent : attention Fig. ....

E. O. Wilson. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard, 1975.

.... will ultimately lead to an understanding of complex reality (Provine, 1971) In evolutionary biology this strategy takes a variety of forms, as for instance genic selectionism (Williams, 1966; Dawkins, 1976) with its powerful impact on understanding the evolution of altruism (see for instance Wilson, 1975). In the study of adaptation, we mostly rely on the analysis of a single character or a tightly integrated complex of characters (Mayr, 1983) and in theoretical quantitative genetics one first concentrates on single character models. Methodological reductionism is a powerful tool to get a handle ....

Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

....is generally whether or not the potentially communicative 9 behavior results in a selective advantage to one or more of the participants involved in the exchange. There seems to be no general consensus, however, on whether communicative acts must benefit the sender, the receiver, or both. Wilson (1975), for example, considers an interaction to be communicative if it is adaptive from the perspective of either participant. Communication is seen by some to be a primarily manipulatory behavior. In this case, it is only important that the behavior convey a selective advantage on the transmitter ....

Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

No context found.

E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, 1975.

No context found.

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Belknap Press / Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

No context found.

E. O. Wilson. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, 1975.

No context found.

Wilson, E.O., Sociobiology: the new synthesis, Harvard University Press, London, Cambridge, 1977.

No context found.

E.O. Wilson. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard, 1975.

No context found.

E.O. Wilson. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Belknap Press, Harvard, 1975.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC