Emilia Bellucci and John Zeleznikow. AI techniques for modelling legal negotiation. In ICAIL-99, pages 108--116. ACM Press, 1999.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles

....conform with the protocol. Hence, if the protocol is specified as a set of strict and defeasible rules, these rules can be used to derive a partial specification of the communication module. A negotiation is a discussion between parties for the purpose of reaching an agreement (cf. for example, [6]) This suggests representing a negotiation as a dialogue between parties, this dialogue is articulated in progressive stages, where the parties make offers, reject or accept offers, or propose counter offers. In the context of a negotiation involving two parties let us call them the Proponent ....

....applicable. 2.3 Choice of Formalism There are several reasons why Defeasible Logic can be considered an appropriate tool to formalize legal negotiation. Let us examine some of them. A negotiation can be thought of as a dialogue between parties concerning the resolution of a common dispute (cf. [6]) In this perspective some authors (cf. 27, 18, 26] suggested the use of argumentation based reasoning formalisms to characterise it, while others proposed the use of argumentation to supplement negotiation procedures (cf. 22] In [11, 12] it was shown that Defeasible Logic can be ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Emilia Bellucci and John Zeleznikow. AI techniques for modelling legal negotiation. In ICAIL-99, pages 108--116. ACM Press, 1999.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC