| J. Chu-Carroll and S. Carberry, "Communication for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agents Collaborative Planning," presented at First International Conference on Multi-Agents Systems, San Francisco, CA, 1995. |
....[5] The uncertainty of the inference correctness in this approach may limit the applicability of this approach. Direct communication involves an agent telling another agent of its intentions. For example, Chu Carroll and Carberry use an enhanced dialog model to capture agents intentions [6]. Then by comparing plans or by reasoning about their goals, an agent can detect potential conflicts. This approach is popular and effective, however, the information exchanged must be precise, accurate and true. Even with the assumption that agents will always tell the truth, there exists a ....
J. Chu-Carroll and S. Carberry, "Communication for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agents Collaborative Planning," presented at First International Conference on Multi-Agents Systems, San Francisco, CA, 1995.
....as well as Lambert s discourse level plans. In fact, it does not seem likely that this model of intention recognition would be applicable outside a domain where an agent is executing predetermined plans. Chu Carroll and Carberry Chu Carroll and Carberry ( Chu Carroll and Carberry, 1994; Chu Carroll and Carberry, 1995; Chu Carroll and Carberry, 1996; Chu Carroll and Carberry, 2000] extended the threelevel model of Lambert and added a fourth level, belief. They also changed the model so that it distinguished between proposed and accepted plans and beliefs. This greatly extended the previous models to include ....
Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry, "Communication for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agent Collaborative Planning," In V. Lesser, editor, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, pages 49--56. AAAI Press, 1995.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC