J.R. Putman, Architecting with RM-ODP, PrenticeHall, 2001. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Achieving Technical Architecture With Architectural - Nguyen (Correct)
....software concerns in five viewpoints: logic, process, physic, deployment, and use cases. Hofmeister and al. 9] relies on four different viewpoints: conceptual, module, code and execution. The ISO standard for architectural specification RM ODP (Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing) [12, 18] separates the concerns of stakeholders into five viewpoints fit to organization problems: Enterprise, Information, Computation, Engineering, and Technology. In order to make a consensus between these architectural concepts, IEEE aims to standardize a meta model for all these concepts [10] All ....
J.R. Putman, Architecting with RM-ODP, PrenticeHall, 2001.
Towards a UML Profile for Model-Based Risk Assessment - Houmb, den Braber, Lund.. (2002) (1 citation) (Correct)
....Analysis. Siv Hilde Houmb et al. 18] and CRAMM [2] 2) Guidelines and methodology for the use of UML [12] to support the risk assessment methodology. 3) A risk management process based on AS NZS 4360 [1] and ISO IEC 17799 [7] 4) A risk documentation framework based on RM ODP [13]. 5) An integrated risk management and system development process based on UP [9] 6) A platform for tool inclusion based on XML [19] An important aspect of the CORAS project is the practical use of UML to support the risk management process in general, and risk assessment in particular. ....
Putman, J. R., Architecting with RM-ODP, Prentice-Hall (2000).
Triune Continuum Paradigm: a paradigm for General System.. - Naumenko (2002) (2 citations) (Correct)
....practitioners tend to consider the formalizafion of the RM ODP part 2 is achieved simply because the ITU T Rec. X.904 I ISO IEC 10746 4 is standardized. This is unfortunate because the standard fails to provide a true consistent formalizafion of the concepts of part 2. This lack is also noticed in [42], which says: It is definitely the case that the degree of brmalism in architecture edfications todq varies, and none, including RM ODP, have achieved a fully mathematical brmal edfication using an appropriate brmal description technique . Unfortunately the book [42] leaves out the part 4 in its ....
....This lack is also noticed in [42] which says: It is definitely the case that the degree of brmalism in architecture edfications todq varies, and none, including RM ODP, have achieved a fully mathematical brmal edfication using an appropriate brmal description technique . Unfortunately the book [42] leaves out the part 4 in its consideration. All of this provided us with excellent motivation for this research on the RM ODP formalizafion and emphasizes the value of its results. Analyzing the causes that prevented the standardization of a single consistent formalizafion of the clauses 8 and 9 ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
J. R. Putman. Architecting with RM-ODP. Prentice Hall, 2001.
A Formal Foundation of the RM-ODP Conceptual Framework - Naumenko, Wegmann (2001) (Correct)
....practitioners tend to consider the formalization of the RM ODP part 2 is achieved simply because the ITU T Rec. X.904 ISO IEC 10746 4 is standardized. This is unfortunate because the standard fails to provide a true consistent formalization of the concepts of part 2. This lack is also noticed in [31], which says: It is definitely the case that the degree of formalism in architecture specifications today varies, and none, including RM ODP, have achieved a fully mathematical formal specification using an appropriate formal description technique . Unfortunately the book [31] leaves out the part ....
....is also noticed in [31] which says: It is definitely the case that the degree of formalism in architecture specifications today varies, and none, including RM ODP, have achieved a fully mathematical formal specification using an appropriate formal description technique . Unfortunately the book [31] leaves out the part 4 in its consideration. All of this provided us with excellent motivation for this research and emphasizes the value of its results. Analyzing the causes that prevented the standardization of a single consistent formalization of the clauses 8 and 9 of part 2, we would argue ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
J. R. Putman.: "Architecting with RM-ODP", Prentice Hall, 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC