| C.L. McGowan and S.A. Bohner. Model Based Process Assessments. In 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 202--211, 1993. |
.... terms of process purpose and outcomes [81] as a list of processes decomposed in constituent activities and tasks defined in natural language [80] Statecharts [89] 117] also see [63] for a comprehensive description of Statecharts) ETVX [116] Actor Dependency modeling [14] 134] SADT notation [102], Petri nets [5] IDEF0 [125] rule based [7] and System Dynamics [1] Other process programming languages have been devised, and these are described in [29] 52] 68] 9.3.4.5 Process Definition Methods These methods specify the activities that must be performed in order to develop and maintain ....
....to develop and maintain a process definition. These may include eliciting information from developers to build a descriptive process definition from scratch, and to tailoring an existing standard or commercial process. Examples of methids that have been applied in practice are [13] 14] 90] 98][102]. In general, there is a strong similarity amongst them in that they tend to follow a traditional software development life cycle. 9.3.4.6 Automation Automated tools either support the execution of the process definitions, or they provide guidance to humans performing the defined processes. In ....
C. McGowan and S. Bohner, "Model Based Process Assessments," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 202-211, 1993.
....Our method considers three aspects when developing a descriptive model: organization, product, and process. Dart et al. 1993) uses different groupings: tools, people, and process. In our method we consider people to be part of the organization, and tools are considered to be part of the process. (McGowan et al. 1993) presents a process assessment method that makes use of process modeling, but it lacks a clear focus for assessment. When analyzing the process, we chose to focus on defects generated during the system release generation process, because these would be defects that would be related to the ....
McGowan, C.L., and Bohner, S.A. (1993). "Model Based Process Assessments," Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, Baltimore, pp.
....system dynamics in modelling software project management issues. This approach and related modelling techniques originated in the seminal work of Forrester and his colleagues at M.I. T [for61,70] More recently it has been applied to the study of aspects of software process improvement, e.g. abd91,mcg93,wae94,mad96] The 1970s study, exemplified by figure 1, revealed regularity unexpected for variables the indirect consequences of human decision but not directly or intentionally controlled. It could and was, therefore, captured in a series of statements abstracting the observed behaviour. Such ....
McGowan CL and Bohner SA, Model Based Process Assessments, Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Softw. Eng., Baltimore, MD, 17 - 21 May 1993, IEEE Comp. Soc. ord. n. 3700-02, pp. 202-211
No context found.
C.L. McGowan and S.A. Bohner. Model Based Process Assessments. In 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 202--211, 1993.
No context found.
C. McGowan and S. Bohner, "Model based process assessments". Proceedings of the 15 Conference on Software Engineering (1993) 202-211.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC