Isabel D'Hanis. Metaforen vanuit een taalfilosofisch, wetenschapsfilosofisch en logisch perspectief. Master's thesis, RUG, 2000. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
The Use of Metaphors in Scientific Development: A Logical Approach - D'Hanis (2002) Self-citation (D'hanis) (Correct)
....they measured but could not explain otherwise. The examples I will discuss in this section are di#erent: they do not concern the understanding of a given metaphor, but the construction of new one. It is commonly accepted that there are important di#erences between these two processes (see also [8]) For instance, the first step in the construction of a metaphor consists in the active search for a source domain that can be used to structure a given target domain. There are, however, also important similarities between the two. In both cases, we can distinguish two subjects or domains, a ....
....is commonly acknowledged that these are di#erent phenomena, with di#erent functions in science, but there are very few theories available on what these di#erences are. As a consequence, the examples I discuss in this section will be called metaphors by some and analogies by others. As I argued in [8], it is impossible to draw a clear distinction between the two phenomena. However, the examples discussed below satisfy the main criteria for metaphors I distinguished in [8] In all of them, the source domain is represented in non literal language. Moreover, the information that is transferred is ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Isabel D'Hanis. Metaforen vanuit een taalfilosofisch, wetenschapsfilosofisch en logisch perspectief. Master's thesis, RUG, 2000.
A Logical Approach to the Analysis of Metaphors - D'Hanis (2002) (5 citations) Self-citation (D'hanis) (Correct)
....transfer of associations from the secondary subject to the primary subject. What we do need, however, is a more sophisticated view on the nature of this metaphorical transfer. A first concept we have to clarify is the so called system of associated commonplaces . As I argued in more detail in [11], the problems concerning the vagueness of Black s terminology can be solved by replacing the idea of a system of associated commonplaces by Barsalou s definition of concepts (as presented in [1] Barsalou states that a concept is a collection of information. It is important to note that, on ....
....with a certain idea. CD information is information with a lower level of accessibility. This information is obtained by going trough actual reasoning processes, whereas CI information is immediately retrieved. The third type of information is of no importance in this paper. The idea I developed in [11] is that analysing a metaphor consists in transferring CI information about the secondary subject to the primary subject. What a metaphorical projection or transfer is and how this exactly proceeds will be clarified by the logic I will present further in this paper. The other important problem ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Isabel D'Hanis. Metaforen vanuit een taalfilosofisch, wetenschapsfilosofisch en logisch perspectief. Master's thesis, RUG, 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC