| Peleg M., Tu S, et al. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. JAMIA, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan-Feb 2003, pp. 52-68 2002. |
No context found.
Peleg M., Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R., Johnson PD, Jones N., Kumar A., Miksch S., Quaglini S., Seyfang A., Shortliffe EH, and Stefanelli M. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):52-68.
No context found.
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R, Johnson PD, Jones N, Kumar A, Miksch S, Quaglini S, Seyfang A, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):5268.
No context found.
Peleg M. Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R., Johnson PD, Jones N., Kumar A., Miksch S., Quaglini S., Seyfang A., Shortliffe EH, and Stefanelli M. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. Preprint doi:10.1197/jamia.M1135
No context found.
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R, Johnson PD, Jones N, Kumar A, Miksch S, Quaglini S, Seyfang A, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):5268.
No context found.
Peleg, M, Tu, SW, Bury, J, et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: A casestudy approach. JAMIA 2003;10(1):52-68.
No context found.
M. Peleg, S. Tu, J. Bury, P. Ciccarese, J. Fox, R. A. Greenes, R. Hall, P. D. Johnson, N. Jones, A. Kumar, S. Miksch, S. Quaglini, A. Seyfang, E. H. Shortliffe & M. Stefanelli. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A CaseStudy Approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan-Feb 2003.
No context found.
Peleg M, Tu SW, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, et al. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2003;10(1):52-68.
....treatment is performed whenever new information about the health state of the patient is entered. Note that while physicians talk about the eligibility of a patient for a certain guideline, in this paper we use the term eligibility in relation to the guideline rather then the patient. [5] . The modes of treatment itself are started by the triggering of the filter condition of one of the treatment options and stopped by either the complete condition or the abort condition of the plan representing the treatment step or the plans containing it. The examples in this paper are ....
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R, Johnson PD, Jones N, Kumar A, Miksch S, Quaglini S, Seyfang A, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M. Comparing ComputerInterpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. JAm Med Inf Assoc, 2003, forthcoming.
No context found.
Peleg M., Tu S, et al. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. JAMIA, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan-Feb 2003, pp. 52-68 2002.
No context found.
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R, Johnson PD, Jones N, Kumar A, Miksch S, Quaglini S, Seyfang A, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M: Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10(1):52-68.
No context found.
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):52-68.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC