| A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, P. Volgyesi, "The Generic Modeling Environment", Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001. |
....in the system through object abstraction, class hierarchies, and method call interfaces. This methodology has been adapted to design embedded and real time software, emphasizing the use of UML [15] to formally specify systems. Object oriented software environments, such as Rational Rose [7] GME [17], and DOME [31] have been applied in control system designs. Noticing that some objects usually work together to provide a logical piece of functionality, middleware oriented design advocates the encapsulation of one or more objects into conceptual services, and composing services into a ....
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi, "The Generic Modeling Environment," in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing (WISP'2001.
....in turn a certain level of reuseability. Compared to dominating metamodeling approaches, VPM has the following distinguishing characteristics. VPM is a multilevel metamodeling framework. The majority of metamodeling approaches (including ones that build upon the MOF standard [23] GME [19], PROGRES [33] or BOOM [26] considers only a predefined number of metalevels. While only [3] a framework for MML) and [4] supports multilevel metamodeling. By the dynamic reconfiguration of type instance relationship between models, VPM provides such a solution that avoids the problem of ....
....approaches, models and operations on them are arranged in a hierarchical structure based on a simple refinement calculus that allows a controlled reuse of information in different domains. Initiatives for a reusable and hierarchical static metamodeling framework include MML [8] and GME [19], however, none of them provides reusability for rules. VPM supports model transformations within and between metamodels. The model transformation concepts of VPM is built on results of previous research [10,38,40] in the field. Similar applications have been reported recently in [14, 15, ....
A. Ledeczi., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing. 2001.
....of both static structure and dynamic behavior. Compared to dominating metamodeling approaches, VPM has the following distinguishing characteristics. VPM is a multilevel metamodeling framework. The majority of metamodeling approaches (including ones that build upon the MOF standard [17] GME [15], PROGRES [21] or BOOM [18] considers only a predefined number of metalevels. While only [3] a framework for MML) and [4] supports multilevel metamodeling. By the dynamic reconfiguration of type instance relationship between models, VPM provides such a solution that avoids the problem of ....
....approaches, models and operations on them are arranged in a hierarchical structure based on a simple refinement calculus that allows a controlled reuse of information in different domains. Initiatives for a reusable and hierarchical static metamodeling framework include MML [7] and GME [15], however, none of them provides reusability for rules. VPM supports model transformations within and between metamodels. The model transformation concepts of VPM is built on results of previous research [27, 28] in the field. Similar applications have been reported recently in [10, 11] ....
A. Ledeczi., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing. 2001.
....varro mit.bme.hu c b 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B. V. afterwards, a well formed sentence of the visual language is defined by a set of rules, where well formedness of a sentence is decided by graphical parsing algorithms. On the other hand, the aim of metamodeling tools (such as GME [9], PROGRES [11] or VIATRA [13] is to define first the abstract syntax of arbitrary modeling languages in a visual UML based notation, while the concrete visual representations of domain specific objects are typically based on visual stereotypes. As its benchmark application, the Unified Modeling ....
Ledeczi., A., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle and P. Volgyesi, The Generic Modeling Environment, in: Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.
....; 0 PIT5A#QU8 1 0 ; 8 A 6 8 Q 0 P 2 9WVWA 4KJLQU8 63X7P 0 8 P 8 Y Z [E #] W # L ( a b ( #b a# rules, where well formedness of a sentence is decided by graphical parsing algorithms. On the other hand, the aim of metamodeling tools (such as GME [6], PROGRES [8] or VIATRA [10] is to define first the abstract syntax of arbitrary modeling languages in a visual UML based notation, while the concrete visual representations of domain specific objects are typically based on visual stereotypes. As its benchmark application, the Unified Modeling ....
Ledeczi., A., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle and P. Volgyesi, The Generic Modeling Environment, in: Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.
....but lacks any formality when concerning dynamic issues. MetaModeling Framework MMF [3] uses a combination of OCL and Class diagrams with a clear distinction between classes and instances, a formal background originating from object theory [1] General Modeling Environment GME [6] uses the same combination for static semantics but the mixing of types and instances is allowed. Business Object Notation BON [9] has its own notation for both constraints and metamodels, and the concepts are formalized in PVS [5] BOOM [8] is a framework for formal specification of ....
A. Ledeczi., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.
....of both static structure and dynamic behavior. Compared to dominating metamodeling approaches, VPM has the following distinguishing characteristics. VPM is a multilevel metamodeling framework. The majority of metamodeling approaches (including ones that build upon the MOF standard [17] GME [15], PROGRES [22] or BOOM [18] considers only a predefined number of metalevels. While only [3] a framework for MML) and [4] supports multilevel metamodeling. By the dynamic reconfiguration of type instance relationship between models, VPM provides such a solution that avoids the problem of ....
....approaches, models and operations on them are arranged in a hierarchical structure based on a simple refinement calculus that allows a controlled reuse of information in different domains. Initiatives for a reusable and hierarchical static metamodeling framework include MML [7] and GME [15], however, none of them provides reusability for rules. VPM supports model transformations within and between metamodels. The model transformation concepts of VPM is built on results of previous research ( 26, 28] in the field . Similar applications have been reported recently in [10, ....
A. Ledeczi., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing. 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, P. Volgyesi, "The Generic Modeling Environment", Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, P. Volgyesi, "The Generic Modeling Environment," Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi "The Generic Modeling Environment", Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
Ledeczi, A.: The Generic Modeling Environment. In: Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing (2001), Budapest, Hungary
No context found.
Ledeczi A., Maroti M., Bakay A., Karsai G., Garrett J., Thomason IV C., Nordstrom G., Sprinkle J., Volgyesi P., "The Generic Modeling Environment," Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
Ledeczi, A. et al. The Generic Modeling Environment. Proc. WISP `01, Budapest, Hungary, May 2001.
No context found.
A. LEDECZI,M.MAROTI,G.KARSAI,J.GARRETT,C.THOMASON,G.NORDSTROM,J.SPRIN- KLE, and P. VOLGYESI. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proceedings of the WISP'2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi, "The generic modeling environment", Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, May 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi., M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Proc. Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.
No context found.
Akos Ledeczi "The Generic Modeling Environment", Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, accepted, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
Ledeczi Akos,"The Generic Modeling Environment ", Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, accepted, Budapest, Hungary, May 17, 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The generic modeling environment. In Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, May 2001.
No context found.
Ledeczi, A., Maroti, M., Bakay, A., Karsai, G., Garrett, J., Thomason, C., Nordstrom, G., Sprinkle, J., and Volgyesi, P., "The Generic Modeling Environment", Proc. WISP `01, Budapest, Hungary, May 2001.
No context found.
Ledeczi, A.; Maroti, M.; Bakay, A.; Karsai, G.; Garrett, J.; Thomason, C.; Nordstrom, G.; Sprinkle, J.; & Volgyesi, P. "The Generic Modeling Environment," in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing (WISP'2001), May, 2001 Budapest, Hungary.
No context found.
Akos Ledeczi, Miklos Maroti, Arpad Bakay, and Gabor Karsai. The generic modeling environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, May 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The generic modeling environment. In Proceedings of Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, May 2001.
No context found.
A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. T. IV, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The generic modeling environment. In Proceedirlgs of Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processins, May 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC