| J. Li, M. Yarvis, and P. Reiher, "Securing Distributed Adaptation," Computer Networks, Special Issue on Programmable Networks, vol. 38, no. 3, 2002. |
....that provides basic services discovery, resource management, security. Although most such frameworks rely on static component linkages, a growing number of systems (Active Frames [23] Eager Handlers [33] Ninja [28] Active Streams [4] CANS [12] Partitionable Services [16] Conductor [21] and a recent version of Globus [9] advocate a more dynamic model, where components are combined at run time, based on the current state of the environment and QoS requirements of the clients. This dynamic model enables applications to flexibly and dynamically adapt to changes in resource ....
....which is automatically inferred) and finer grained control (the rights afforded a request can be modulated to the credentials associated with it as opposed to the local credentials these translate to) Expressing component and network properties. Most dynamic component based frameworks ([28, 21, 12, 16]) rely on an application registration step, where complete specifications of the application components are provided to permit automated deployment planning. Our use of dRBAC credentials to model general application and network level properties and constraints is in marked contrast to other ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
J. Li, M. Yarvis, and P. Reiher. Securing Distributed Adaptation. In OpenArch, 2001.
No context found.
J. Li, M. Yarvis, and P. Reiher, "Securing Distributed Adaptation," Computer Networks, Special Issue on Programmable Networks, vol. 38, no. 3, 2002.
No context found.
J. Li, M. Yarvis, and P. Reiher. "Securing Distributed Adaptation." Computer Networks, Special Issue on Programmable Networks, vol. 38, no. 3, 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC