Berners-Lee, T.: Work in progress Sep 1998. Semantic Web Road map. See http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
First 50 documents
Reasoning in the SHOQ(Dn) Description Logic - Pan, Horrocks (2002) (Correct)
....work is motivated by the requirement for n ary datatype predicates in relation to real world properties such as size, weight and duration, in the Semantic Web applications. 1 Introduction Description Logics (DLs) are of crucial importance to the development of the so called Semantic Web [2], where their role is to provide formal underpinnings and automated reasoning services for Semantic Web ontology languages [3, 10] such as DAML OIL [6] Significant effort has already been devoted to the investigation of suitable DLs in particular, Horrocks and Sattler [7] have presented the ....
Tim Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URLhttp://www.w3. org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
Extending Datatype Support in Web Ontology Reasoning - Pan, Horrocks (2002) (1 citation) (Correct)
....with a proof of its soundness and completeness. The work is motivated by the requirement for n ary datatype predicates and qualified number restrictions with n ary predicates in relation to real world properties in semantic Web ontologies and applications. 1 Introduction The Semantic Web [2] is a vision of the next generation Web, in which the current rendering markup, which specifies how to display Web resources for human consumption, will be enhanced with so called semantic markup, which will specify the meaning of web resources so as to make them more accessible to automatic ....
Tim Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URLhttp://www.w3. org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
Preserving modularity in XML encoding of description logics - Euzenat (2001) (2 citations) (Correct)
....allowed a methodic approach to complexity evaluation. We present a way to preserve this modularity in encoding description logics in XML and show how it can be used for building modular transformations and assembling them easily. 1 Motivation In the words of Tim Berners Lee, the semantic web [2] requires a set of languages of increasing expressiveness such that anyone can pick up the right language for each particular semantic web application. This is the approach taken by the description logic community over the years. We show how the modularity of description logics, that has mainly ....
....a precise knowledge of the semantics of constructs. This is eased by a transformation from DSD to L T E X. computing interpretations from the input of the base assignment of the variables. checking proof of transformations is a very promising application in the line of the web of trust idea [2]. proving transformations in an assisted or automatic way; inferring transformations from the semantics description is a very hard problem. However, from a given proof, it can be easier. One of the more promising use is proof checking. We said above that transformations could be build from ....
Tim Berners-Lee. Semantic web roadmap, 1998. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html.
Towards a Principled Approach to Semantic Interoperability - Euzenat (2001) (1 citation) (Correct)
....domain. Then, new applications of this definition to family of languages, ontology patterns and explicit description of semantics are presented. Keywords: Semantic interoperability, ontology sharing, knowledge transformation, ontology patterns. 1 Introduction The vision of a semantic web [Berners Lee, 1998; BernersLee et al. 2001] is realized by the annotation of web pages, containing informal knowledge as we know it now, with formal knowledge. These annotations can reference each other and depend on ontologies and background knowledge. Taking advantage of the semantic web requires to be able to ....
....a precise knowledge of the semantics of constructs. This is eased by a transformation from DSD to L A T E X. computing interpretations from the input of the base assignment of the variables. checking proof of transformations is a very promising application in the line of the web of trust idea [BernersLee, 1998] . proving transformations in an assisted or automatic way; inferring transformations from the semantics description is a very hard problem. However, from a given proof, it can be a straightforward task. This program is rather ambitious. However, in some very restricted setting, this can be ....
Tim BernersLee. Semantic web roadmap, 1998. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html.
An Artefact Repository to Support Distributed Software.. - Nutter, Boldyreff, Rank (2003) (Correct)
....to associate other artefacts with the project. Default The simplest type of artefact, this is used when no others will fit . It contains a piece of data and information describing who put it there, nothing more. OSCAR s base meta data model is designed to be in conformance with the Semantic Web [1] by employing open standards with tool support such as RDF [9] and (specialised) Dublin Core meta data. Additionally the prototype system is internet ready by default; every unique artefact identifier is a URI which, in conjunction with a version number if a historical version is desired, can be ....
T. Berners-Lee. Semantic web road map. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, September 1998.
SemanticWeb Meta-data for e-Learning - Some.. - Nilsson.. (2002) (3 citations) (Correct)
....evolves, never reaching any final form, but rather changing continously, reflecting the needs and thoughts of those using it. It s evolution, and it is a natural part of the meta data eco system. We therefore argue that meta data needs a flexible, extensible, layered architecture based on RDF [28, 6]. 2.4 Meta data Instances, or The Great RDF vs. XML Battle The fourth misconception relates to XML, and has its roots in the popularity of XML as a document format. Describing meta data in XML (based on XML schema, not on RDF) naturally leads to a document oriented view of meta data for a ....
T. Berners-Lee. Semantic Web Roadmap. http://www.w3.org/ DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Sept. 1998.
On the Automated Classification of Web Sites - Pierre (2001) (2 citations) (Correct)
....being added daily. Describing and organizing this vast amount of content is essential for realizing the web s full potential as an information resource. Accomplishing this in a meaningful way will require consistent use of metadata and other descriptive data structures such as semantic linking[1]. Categorization is an important ingredient as is evident from the popularity of web directories such as Yahoo [2] Looksmart[3] and the Open Directory Project[4] However these resources have been created by large teams of human editors and represent only one type of classification scheme that, ....
....scratch is not feasible. Related work is discussed in section 5. In section 6 we state our conclusions and make suggestions for further research. 2 Text Categorization of Web Content The current state of the web differs markedly from the vision of the semantic web as outlined by Tim Berners Lee[1]. While web content is machine readable for the most part , it is far from machine understandable. Furthermore the ability for computers to understand written human language is still quite limited at this point in time. Therefore, in this work we have adopted a text categorization approach that ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
T. Berners-Lee. Semantic Web Road Map. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, 1998.
Interoperability Adaptors for Distributed Information Search.. - Tous, Delgado (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee, T.: Work in progress Sep 1998. Semantic Web Road map. See http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html.
Does Topic Metadata Help With Web Search? - This Is Preprint (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-Lee. Semantic web road map, 1998.
Ontology-Based Semantic Online Classification of Documents: .. - De Luca, Nürnberger (2004) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-Lee, 1998, "Semantic Web Road map", http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
Through GUI Based Rule Generation - Josh Stewart Submitted (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee, T. (1998). Semantic web road map, W3C Design Issues.
Using Clustering Methods to Improve Ontology-Based Query.. - De Luca, Nürnberger (2006) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee T. Semantic web road map; 1998. Available at: http://www.w3.org/ DesignIssues/Semantic.html
Argument-Based Critics and Recommenders: A Qualitative .. - Chesnevar, Maguitman, .. (2005) (Correct)
No context found.
T. Berners-Lee. Semantic web road map. Technical report, W3C Design Issues, 1998.
A Framework For Contextual Mediation In Mobile And.. - Chalmers, Dulay, Sloman (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee T (1998) Semantic Web roadmap. http:// www.w3.org/2001/sw/. Cited September 1998
A MDA-based Approach to the Ontology Definition Metamodel - Djuric, Gasevic, Devedzic (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-Lee, "Semantic Web Road Map", W3C Design Issues, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, 1998.
The Role of Standards in Creating Community - Kathi Martin Associate (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee, Tim.(1998) Semantic Web Road Map. http://www.w3c.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
Selecting the Best Web Service - Day (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee, T. Semantic web road map. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, September 1998.
Bipartite Graphs as Intermediate Model for RDF - Hayes, Gutierrez (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-Lee. Semantic Web Road map. World Wide Web, http: //www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, September 1998.
RDFS(FA) and RDF MT: Two Semantics for RDFS - Jeff Pan And (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
T. Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URL http://www.w3. org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
Reasoning in the SHOQ(D n - Description Logic Je (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URLhttp://www.w3. org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
Information Infrastructure Laboratory - Hp Laboratories Palo (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
T. Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URL http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
RDFS(FA): A DL-ised Sub-language of RDFS - Je Pan And (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URL http: //www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
A Framework For Contextual Mediation In Mobile And.. - Chalmers, Dulay, Sloman (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee T (1998) Semantic Web roadmap. http:// www.w3.org/2001/sw/. Cited September 1998
The OntoWordNet Project: extension and axiomatization of .. - Gangemi, Navigli.. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Berners-Lee T., Semantic Web Road map, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, 1998
RDFS(FA): A DL-ised Sub-language of RDFS - Je Pan And (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Tim Berners-lee. Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues. URL http: //www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html, Oct. 1998.
First 50 documents
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC