Kobryn, C. (2000). Modeling Components and Frameworks with UML. Communications of ACM, 43(10), 31-38. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Modeling and Analyzing Software Behavior in UML - Porres (2001) (Correct)
....models. Ideally, a diagram editor would allow the user to create any legal UML diagram and only legal UML diagrams. By legal we mean diagrams that conform to the UML syntax specification. Unfortunately, at the time of writing there is no tool that has complete support for the whole UML standard [61]. This situation is aggravated when trying to use a specific UML extension. In this case, a generic drawing program can be more useful than a full featured UML CASE tool. In this group we can also include drawing aids such as the electronic white board with handwriting recognition of UML symbols ....
C. Kobryn. Modeling components and frameworks with UML. Communications of ACM, 43(10):31--38, October 2000.
Reengineering the "Enterprise" Game to the Web - Mazanec (Correct)
.... (a watchdog process which monitors the sessions 77 and removes timed out connections would be a thinkable way to solve this prob lem) Thinking of a large scale distributed solution it will be necessary to set up a communication framework, which defines the relations between the main components [KOB00]. 6.7.2 Chent 1 with Client n with Webbrowser Webbrowser Load Balancer . Smulabonserver 1 Smulatonserver 2 Databasecluster Figure 23: High scalability is achieved through multi level distribution The architecture of Web Enterprise discussed in this paper can be used for all ....
Kobryn, Ch., Modeling Components and Frameworks with UML, in Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43 No. 10, pp. 31-38, 2000
A Graphical Representation of COTS-based Software.. - Monge, Alves, Vallecillo (2000) (Correct)
.... are the semantic clashes between the UML and ADL concepts (e.g. the term component has slightly different meanings in both worlds) the lack of a clear mapping between the UML and the ADL concepts (as discussed in [5] the vague semantics of UML versus the precise semantics required by ADLs [10], and the gaps that currently UML has for modeling and exploiting architectural styles, explicit software connectors, and local and global architectural constraints [13] Several authors have studied the expressiveness of UML in order to represent software architectures, and the ways to adapt ....
....aspects so they can be incorporated into existing software architectures. In the first place, several authors have pointed out the problems that UML currently has for modeling Software Architectures, as well as the possible ways to overcome them using the standard UML 1. x facilities [5, 10, 13, 22]. As a common conclusion, there is no solution without extending UML. In this sense, let us see what UML 2.0 is able to offer, although in the initial responses to the Superstructure RFP some problems still remain. On the other hand, the work by Bran Selic and Jim Rumbaugh about modeling ....
Cris Kobryn. Modeling components and frameworks with UML. Communications of the ACM, 43(10):31--38, October 2000.
Distributed Systems Security - None (2001) (Correct)
....Java authorization systems are hard to use by systems administrators, there is a need for a convenient tool. Karger [Kar97] thinks that the OS must isolate applets from each other and control their access, otherwise no Java authorization mechanism can be effective. Components The ECF pattern [Kob00] is an abstract representation of components and can describe by proper specialization EJBs and COM components. EJBs have Deployment Descriptors, which contain Access Control Entries. Each entry identifies a person, group, or role that can access the whole bean or some specific methods. JNDI also ....
C. Kobryn, "Modeling components and frameworks with UML", Comm of the ACM, October
Managing Accessible User Interfaces of Multi-Vendor.. - The Ulysses Framework (2001) (Correct)
No context found.
Kobryn, C. (2000). Modeling Components and Frameworks with UML. Communications of ACM, 43(10), 31-38.
A Framework for Modeling Strategy, Business.. - Vasconcelos.. (Correct)
No context found.
Kobryn, Cris, Modeling Components and Frameworks with UML, Communications of the ACM, Vol.43,N.10, ACM, October 2000.
Selecting A Software Engineering - Methodology Using Multiobjective (Correct)
No context found.
Kobryn, Cris. "Modeling Components and Frameworks with UML," Communications of the ACM Vol 43: No 10 p. 31-38 (October 2000).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC