De Michelis, G. and Grasso, M. A. Situating Conversations within the Language/Action Perspective: The Milan Conversation Model, ACM CSCW Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1994. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Searching for Meaning - Performatives and Obligations in.. - Tseng, Backhouse (2000) (Correct)
....must somehow be considered. In other words, it is not just important to produce definitions, but also to understand the situatedness of the conversations in which the definitions are produced, the way in which the definitions are represented and how they are understood by the people who use them [26, 2, 19]. Thus, a fundamental problem has not been addressed by the TPM (and by the SPM, so far) how to make the link between the specific social organizational and work situations and the conversations for specification Who are to be the initiators, executors, and evaluators of these conversations ....
.... and work situations and the conversations for specification Who are to be the initiators, executors, and evaluators of these conversations and what should be on their agendas To this purpose, it is important that the context of the specification conversation is taken into account [2]. However, the idea of context in speech act theory is still relatively unexplored. Although it is recognized that each individual speech act is embedded in an abstract social context (e.g. conditions such as the propositional content and preparatory rules and the fact that the lifeworlds of ....
G. De Michelis and M.A. Grasso. Situating conversations within the language /action perspective: The Milan Conversation Model. In R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth, editors, CSCW '94, pages 89--100. ACM, 1994.
The Initialization of Conversations for Specification: A Context.. - de Moor (2000) (1 citation) (Correct)
....must somehow be considered. In other words, it is not just important to produce definitions, but also to understand the situatedness of the conversations in which the definitions are produced, the way in which the definitions are represented and how they are understood by the people who use them [26, 2, 19]. Thus, a fundamental problem has not been addressed by the TPM (and by the SPM, so far) how to make the link between the specific social organizational and work situations and the conversations for specification Who are to be the initiators, executors, and evaluators of these conversations ....
.... and work situations and the conversations for specification Who are to be the initiators, executors, and evaluators of these conversations and what should be on their agendas To this purpose, it is important that the context of the specification conversation is taken into account [2]. However, the idea of context in speech act theory is still relatively unexplored. Although it is recognized that each individual speech act is embedded in an abstract social context (e.g. conditions such as the propositional content and preparatory rules and the fact that the lifeworlds of ....
G. De Michelis and M.A. Grasso. Situating conversations within the language /action perspective: The Milan Conversation Model. In R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth, editors, CSCW '94, pages 89--100. ACM, 1994.
From User Participation to User Seduction in the.. - Agostini, De.. (1 citation) Self-citation (Giorgio) (Correct)
.... of work practices and human cooperation: the situatedness of work and the need for context awareness [18] the idea that groups working together constitute communities of practice [14] the relevance of articulation work [17] the inextricable linking of communication and action in work processes [6, 20]. Even if it does not exist a well defined and complete CSCW approach to system design and development, some interesting techniques have been developed both at the analysis level (in particular, the ethnographic observation methods of work practices) and at the design level (enhancing the ....
De Michelis, Giorgio and Maria Antonietta Grasso (1994): Situating conversations within the language/action perspective: the Milan Conversation Model. In: Proceedings of the 5th Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October 22-26, ACM Press, New York, pp. 89-100.
Keeping Workflow Models as Simple as Possible - Agostini, De Michelis, Petruni (1994) (1 citation) Self-citation (De michelis) (Correct)
....Support System. We have called it the Milan Workflow Management System (MWMS) since it will be part of a larger system aiming to fully support work processes: the Milano System. Its Workflow Model is based on Petri Nets, as many previous Workflow Management Systems (see [Kreifelts et al. 1991, Ader et al. 1994]. Petri Nets are widely used for specifying any sort of mechanisms of interaction within Computer Supports for Cooperative Work [Simone et al. 1994] But on the one hand it is based on a small subclass of Elementary Net Systems (see [Rozenberg Thiagarajan 1986, Rozenberg 1987, Thiagarajan ....
....embedded in the Milan Workflow Management System (MWMS) we are developing at the Laboratory for Cooperation Technologies of the University of Milano. It will be the basic feature guiding the integration of MWMS and MCM (Milan Conversation Model, the conversation handler under development in Milan [De Michelis Grasso 1994]) within the Milano System, since it allows us to build the exceptional paths the users may define through their conversations. If a user opens a conversation to face a breakdown occurring within a workflow, when an exceptional path is chosen within the conversation, the Workflow Model checks if ....
De Michelis, G., Grasso, M. A. Situating conversations within the language/action perspective: the Milan conversation Model. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on CSCW. ACM, New York, 1994, (to appear).
Interactive Process Models - Jørgensen (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
De Michelis, G. and Grasso, M. A. Situating Conversations within the Language/Action Perspective: The Milan Conversation Model, ACM CSCW Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1994.
Taking the Distributed Nature of Cooperative Work Seriously - Simone, Schmidt (1998) (Correct)
No context found.
De Michelis, Giorgio, and M. Antonietta Grasso: `Situating conversations within the language/action perspective: The Milan Conversation Model,' in T. Malone (ed.) CSCW '94. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October 24-26, 1994, ACM Press, New York, N.Y., 1994, pp. 89100.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC