| S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast," IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 983--1001, Aug. 1997. |
....or more layers in the encoded video. The layers are progressive, the higher layers depend on the lower layers, and the higher layers are used to refine quality. The various scalable compression approaches di#er in terms of granularity, ranging from very coarse, as in the work in Layered Multicast [25] and MPEG 2 Scalability [13] to very fine, such as in recent work in MPEG 4 and H.26L Fine Granularity Scalability [24, 14] With the current state of the art, scalable video compression comes with a compression e#ciency penalty, in that video quality is lower compared to the results of ....
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-driven Layered Multicast. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(6):983--1001, August 1997.
....it is a non scalable approach that does not handle the bandwidth heterogeneity of a multicast environment. For video conferencing, when there is typically a large stationary background, the use of conditional replenishment with intra block coding has been proposed to reduce error propagation [85]. For non conferencing contents however, the scheme generally yields poor compression performance due to the exclusive use of intra block coding. 2.2.4 Transcoding Transcoding can be considered an extension to the adaptive single layer approach to pre compressed video. The idea is to fully or ....
....and compression e#ciency. A scheme based on 3D subband decomposition is preferred to motion compensated residual coding (MCRC) because MCRC uses previously coded frames as reference for coding future frames which introduce data dependency and thus error propagation when reference frames are lost [85, 72]. In addition, schemes employing 3D subband decomposition have the potential of generating embedded representations with fine granularity of available bit rates [134] In contrast, scalable compression schemes based on MCRC either employ multiple prediction loops that preclude fine grain ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE J. Selected Area Comm., 15(6), pp. 983--1001, August 1997.
.... in a class with guaranteed quality, while a layer that enhances the quality could be sent as best effort [6] Recently, layered coding has been adopted as a means to provide a distribution service such as scalable video delivery over a network that consists of both high and lowcapacity links [8, 9, 12, 2]. By layering, the server can provide a range of bit rates and qualities. Each user or receiver may choose the number of layers to receive based on the link capacity with which the user connects to the network and the processing power of the end device. This paper presents a novel layered coding ....
....proposed by Ghanbari [7] and has since then become one of the most promising techniques to facilitate video streaming or delivery over heterogeneous networks. Recently, layered coding is adopted as a means to enable video distribution over networks that consist of both high and low capacity links [8, 9, 12, 2]. Layered coding has also been adopted in several video delivery standards such as H.263 , MPEG 2 and JPEG 2000. However, in these cases, layered coding is mainly used to achieve some degree of rate scalability and do not generate layers based on resolution levels. Consequently, a client may ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Lowcomplexity Video Coding for Receiver-driven Layered Multicast", IEEE JSAC, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 983-1001, Aug. 1997.
....of traffic parameters are essential. Considering video over the Internet, we see that little feedback is available. This is for good reason, since in multicasting applications each user experiences completely different channel char acteristics. However, video applications such as vic [44, 45] do an excellent job of supporting the service by making appropriate choices in the video coding strategy. For example, since packet losses are common, vic uses an intraframe, conditional replenishment method, with frequent re freshing of all the image blocks. More sophisticated versions, ....
....the service by making appropriate choices in the video coding strategy. For example, since packet losses are common, vic uses an intraframe, conditional replenishment method, with frequent re freshing of all the image blocks. More sophisticated versions, including those based on scalable coding [45], are being developed. In particular, in receiver driven layered multicasting, the layered video stream can be stripped to consist of only the video resolution that provides the best quality for the bandwidth that is available to the client. In general, future video applications are more likely ....
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, August 1997.
....data partitioning approach [68] can be used for rate control. For all its simplicity few real applications of scalable video in a communications context have been reported. One of the few examples of application of these techniques to Internet video is the proposed layered multicast approach [69], where the end clients can subscribe the number of layers (and thus overall resolution) that their bandwidth can support. To conclude this chapter we summarize the key ideas and comment on some of the issues that still remain to be addressed before true VBR video networking becomes reality. We ....
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver- driven layered multicast," IEEE J. on $el. Areas in Comm., vol. 15, pp. 983-1001, Aug. 1997. 55
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Lowcomplexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):983 --1001, Aug. 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast," IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 983--1001, Aug. 1997.
No context found.
Steven McCanne, Martin Vetterli, and Van Jacobson. Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):982--1001, 1997.
No context found.
McCanne S., Vetterli M. and Jacobson V., Low-complexity Video Coding for Receiverdriven Layered Multicast, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 15, pp. 9831001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast," IEEE JSAC, vol. 16, no. 6, Aug. 1997, pp. 983-1001.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Low-Complexity Video Coding for ReceiverDriven Layered Multicast. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):983-- 1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast, " IEEE JSAC, vol. 16, no. 6, Aug. 1997, pp. 983-1001.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-Complexity Video Coding Receiver-driven Layered Multicast," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 983 -- 1001, 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast, " IEEE JSAC, vol. 16, no. 6, Aug. 1997, pp. 983-1001.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast," IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 16, pp. 983--1001, Aug. 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):983--1001, August 1997.
No context found.
Steven McCanne, Martin Vetterli, and Van Jacobson. Low-complexity Video Coding for Receiver-driven Layered Multicast. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(6):983 - 1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. R. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson. Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):983--1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast," IEEE Journal on SelectedAreas in Communications,vol. 15, pp. 983 -- 1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low-complexity video coding for receiverdriven layered multicast," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 15, pp. 983--1001, August 1997. 126
No context found.
Steven McCanne, Martin Vetterli, and Van Jacobson. Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):982-1001, 1997.
No context found.
McCanne S., Vetterli M. and Jacobson V. Low-complexity Video Coding for Receiver-driven Layered Multicast. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(6):983--1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli and V. Jacobson, "Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 983-1001, August 1997.
No context found.
S. McCanne, M. Vetterli, and V. Jacobson, "Low--complexity video coding for receiver--driven layered multicast," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 983--1001, Aug. 1997.
No context found.
McCanne, S., M. Vetterliand V. Jacobson, Low-Complexity Video Coding for Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications pp. 983-1001 1997.
First 50 documents
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC