| H. Frystyk-Nielsen, J. Gettys, A. Baird-Smith, E. Prud'hommeaux, H. Wium-Lie and C. Lilley, "Network Performance Effects of HTTP/1.1, CSS1 and PNG", Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM `97, Cannes, France, September 1997. |
....and [21] We examine our data set for similar characteristics to determine how the workload changes in a cable modem environment. Other studies have examined the workloads of various components of the Web, including clients ( 7] 13] servers ( 4] 12] 22] and the HTTP protocol ( 6] [16], 23] The main performance benefit of Web proxies is the file caching that they perform. There are two general approaches to file cache management. One approach attempts to use as few resources as possible by making good replacement decisions when the cache is full (we call this the elegant ....
H. Frystyk-Nielsen, J. Gettys, A. Baird-Smith, E. Prud'hommeaux, H. Wium-Lie and C. Lilley, "Network Performance Effects of HTTP/1.1, CSS1 and PNG", Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM `97, Cannes, France, September 1997.
....for small data transfers (like the Web s requests and responses) Nagle algorithm, which tries to avoid the overhead of small packets can introduce delays to Web requests . Multiple connections are often used for physically co located transfers These and other problems have been discussed in [10, 13, 12, 3, 6, 9, 4]. Many of the problems mentioned above are inherent to the HTTP 1.0 protocol and attempts have been made to fix them in HTTP 1.1. All of those changes concentrated on the interactions between HTTP and TCP protocols, trying to optimize how TCP is used within the HTTP protocol. There is also an ....
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Jim Gettys, Anselm Baird-Smith, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Hkon Wium Lie, Chris Lilley, "Network Performance Effects of HTTP/1.1, CSS1, and PNG", W3C NOTE 24-June 1997, http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Performance/Pipeline.html
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC