| S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48--53, November/December 2000. |
....xed o set scheme is the fact that the processing and switch con guration time at each OBS node is assumed to be pretty much the same. This assumption may not e realistic because of the inevitable jitter caused by the queueing delays in the OBS control channel. Statistical O sets. Verma et al. [20] believe that the xed o set technique of JET would lead to a high burst loss probability. Their claim is based on the observation that having xed o sets makes it possible for two OBS edge nodes to become completely synchronized and therefore to continually contend for the same network resources. ....
....classes of trac. Classes Based On Extended O sets. One of the proposed QoS schemes for OBS is the extended o set , where the higher priority trac is assigned a longer o set between the transmission of its control packet and its corresponding data burst [22] As classi ed by Verma et al. [20], the delay of each data burst in an OBSN consists of a xed and a variable component. The xed component is the inevitable propagation delay from the source to the destination. On the other hand, the variable component is controllable because it is a combination of the upper layer queueing delays ....
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, 14(6):48-53, November 2000.
....port conflict, it may drop a burst. The performance of OBS has been studied by several authors. To the best of our knowledge, most performance studies of OBS networks are based on either simulation or simple analytical models under the assumption that the burst arrival process is Poisson. In [1] [4], an output port of an OBS node is analyzed assuming Poisson arrivals and no buffering. Under these assumptions, an output port can be modeled by a finite number of servers, each representing a wavelength, with no queue. Then, the probability that a burst destined to this output port is lost can ....
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, pp. 48--53, November/December 2000.
....burst, which is expected to arrive after the time interval given by the offset field in the header. When the data burst arrives it is switched entirely in the optical domain. The BHC, on the other hand, is regenerated with the information of the next node to which the data burst has to be sent [4]. Section 2 of this paper describes the OPNET model being developed and its relevance to the investigation of OBS protocol performance. In Section 3 the implementation of a model for the physical layer of an Optical Burst Switching (OBS) network is described. As OBS allows switching of data ....
S Verma, H Chaskar, and R Ravikanth , "Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone ", IEEE Network magazine, vol. 14, pp. 48-53, November/December 2000.
....a signi cantly improved switching time of a few nanoseconds by deploying semiconductor optical ampli ers (SOAs) or lithium niobate based components. In the meantime, Optical Burst Switching (OBS) seems to be a viable intermediate step between current lambda switching and future packet switching [6]. OBS aggregates multiple packets, e.g. IP packets, into bursts at the optical network edge and makes a one way reservation by sending a control packet prior to transmitting the corresponding data burst. OBS does not require bu ering at intermediate nodes and allows for statistical multiplexing. ....
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical Burst Switching: A viable solution for Terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, 14(6):48-53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
....exhibit a signi cantly improved switching time of a few ns by deploying semiconductor optical ampli ers (SOAs) or lithium niobate based components. In the meantime, Optical Burst Swtiching (OBS) seems to be a viable intermediate step between current lambda switching and future packet switching [6]. OBS aggregates multiple packets, e.g. IP packets, into burts at the optical network edge and makes a one way reservation by 2 sending a control packet prior to transmitting the corresponding data burst. OBS does not require bu ering at intermediate nodes and allows for statistical multiplexing. ....
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical Burst Switching: A viable solution for Terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48-53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48--53, November/December 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, vol. 14, pp. 48--53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone," IEEE Network, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 48--53.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst switching: A viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 48--53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone", IEEE Network, Vol. 14, No. 6, Nov. - Dec. 2000 , pp. 48-53
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit Backbone", IEEE Network, Vol. No. 6, pp. 48-53, 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48--53, November/December 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar and R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 48-53, 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network , pp. 48-53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A viable solution for Terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network , November/December 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, R. Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone," IEEE Network Nov/Dec 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48--53, November/December 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, R. Ravikanth, "Optical burst switching: A viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, Vol. 14, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 48-53
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth. Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone. IEEE Network, pages 48--53, November/December 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, R. Ravikanth, Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone, IEEE Network 14 (6), 48 - 53 (2000)
No context found.
Sanjeev Verma, Hemant Chaskar and Raradurgam Ravikanth, "Optical Burst Switching: A Viable Solution for Terabit IP Backbone,"IEEE Network, pp.48-53, Nov/Dec. 2000.
No context found.
Sanjeev Verma, et al. "Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone", IEEE network, pp. 48-53, Nov/Dec 2000.
No context found.
S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, " Optical Burst Switching: A viable solution for terabit IP backbone," IEEE Network, pp. 48-53, Nov./Dec. 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC