Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Adaptive Logics and the Integration of Induction and Deduction - Meheus (2002) (Correct)
.... logics for compatibility ( 17] pragmatic truth ( 48] the closed world assumption and negation as failure ( 69] diagnostic reasoning ( 70] and [21] inductive generalizations ( 14] and [16] abduction and inference to the best explanation ( 54] and [53] and the analysis of metaphors ([32] and [33] An informal discussion of adaptive logics for analogies can be found in [41] What all these logics have in common is that, as their name implies, they adapt themselves to the specific set of premises to which they are applied. This means that, at least for some of the inference ....
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear.
Empirical Progress and Ampliative Adaptive Logics - Meheus (Correct)
.... for compatibility ( 7] for pragmatic truth ( 15] for the closed world assumption and negation as failure ( 20] for diagnostic reasoning ( 21] and [9] for induction ( 5] for abduction ( 8] 16] and [18] for question generation ( 17] and for the analysis of metaphors ( 10] and [11]) An informal discussion of adaptive logics for analogies can be found in [13] 5 The logics for abduction that are presented in [18] also validate inferences of the form A # B, B A. However, they do not enable one to infer hypotheses that are empirically 4 I shall proceed as follows. ....
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear.
Ampliative Adaptive Logics and the Foundation of.. - Meheus.. (1 citation) (Correct)
....to design a proof theory for them. 4 An inference pattern is called ampliative if it leads to conclusions that go beyond the information contained in the premises. 2 [8] induction ( 5] inference to the best explanation ( 27] question generation ( 28] and the analysis of metaphors ([14]) An informal discussion of adaptive logics for analogies can be found in [19] As we shall see, both CP1 and CP2 are based on Classical Logic (henceforth CL) However, to make their proof theory as simple as possible, both systems are defined with respect to a modal adaptive logic that is based ....
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear.
An Adaptive Logic Based on Jaskowski's - Meheus (Correct)
....an ampliative logic. For Priest, the standard of reasoning is the monotonic paraconsistent logic LP, but it is sensible to presuppose consistency unless and until proven otherwise see [28] Other examples of ampliative logics are logics of compatibility (see [9] of metaphorical reasoning (see [16]) of diagnosis (see [10] of abduction (see [26] and of inference to the best explanation (see [25] The semantics of an adaptive logic is obtained by selecting a subset of the models of the lower limit logic. The selection is determined by the adaptive strategy. The Minimal Abnormality ....
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear.
The Use of Metaphors in Scientific Development: A Logical Approach - D'Hanis (2002) Self-citation (D'hanis) (Correct)
....a metaphor according to Black is that we consider a system of associated commonplaces about the secondary subject and project these upon the primary subject. The result is that the primary subject is extended with the commonplaces about the secondary subject. However, as I explained in [9], the original view still has many shortcomings. A first problem is the vague terminology Black used to describe his view. He doesn t define terms like system of associated commonplaces or metaphorical projection . A second and more important one is the so called relevance problem. According to ....
....problem. According to Black, we consider a system of commonplaces associated with the secondary subject and project these upon the primary subject. The problem, however, is that all commonplaces are projected. According to Black, 1) for example, allows us to derive that men howl at the moon. In [9], I presented an alternative version of interactionism that copes with these shortcomings. This modified view is best explained by relying on the common distinction between three di#erent stages in the understanding of metaphors. I will keep the idea of three di#erent stages, but the ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. In Lorenzo Magnani, Nancy J. Nersessian, and Claudio Pizzi, editors, Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, To Appear.
Empirical Progress and - Ampliative Adaptive Logics (Correct)
No context found.
Isabel D'Hanis. A logical approach to the analysis of metaphors. To appear.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC