Galbraith J.R. Organizational Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....makes up the whole of what we call an organization. The most significant aspects towards the coordination of morphological knowledge concerns the following issues of clarity: 1. Clarity of micro and macro aspects of management (Enquist, 1999; Grant, 1992) 2. Clarity of rational hierarchies (Galbraith, 1973, 1977, 1998) 3. Clarity of emotional networks (Dahlbom, 1998; Harrington, 1991) 4. Clarity of balance between rational hierarchies and emotional networks (Enquist, 1999) As to the issue of incorporation of time and space, references are made to the work of Zachman. 5 Aristotle: Those that do not ....

Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organizational Design, Addison-Wesley.

....of alternative possible integrations of bids as options for a decision, the usual assumptions of decision theory do not apply. Unless an arbitrator is brought in, the participants in the conflict will evaluate the options differently, obtaining different decisions, and so perpetuating the conflict [Galbraith 1977]. While decision theory does allow for alternative evaluations to be taken into account, this is to allow for uncertainty, and probability theory is used to analyse the alternatives. If the differences arise not from uncertainty but from different perspectives, no probablistic analysis can be ....

Galbraith, J. R., 1977, "Organizational Design", Addison-Wesley, MA.

.... and Obel s linear programs (Burton Obel 1984) or Malone s queueing models (Malone 1987) but is influenced by them, and by the importance of environmental uncertainty, variance, and dependency that appear in contingency theoretic and open systems views of organizations (Lawrence Lorsch 1967, Galbraith 1977, Stinchcombe 1990, Scott 1987) 16.1.1 General Framework The principle purpose of a T MS model is to analyze, explain, or predict the performance of a system or some component. While T MS does not establish a particular performance criteria, it focuses on providing two kinds of performance ....

Galbraith, J. (1977), Organizational Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

....out that there is no single organization or coordination protocol that is the best for all environments. In human organizations, environmental factors such as dynamism and task uncertainty have a strong effect on what coordinated actions are and how organizationally acceptable outcomes arise[18, 9, 33]. These effects have been observed in purely computational organizations as well[8, 7, 6, 23, 26] Achieving effective coordination in a multi agent system (MAS) is a difficult problem for a number of reasons. An agent s local control decisions about what activity to do next or what information to ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

.... of pooled, sequential, and reciprocal processes [42] Burton and Obel s linear programs [2] or Malone s queueing models [26] but is influenced by them, and by the importance of environmental uncertainty and dependency that appear in contingency theoretic and open systems views of organizations [22, 14, 40, 34]. As a problem representation for computational tasks, it is richer and more expressive than game theory [32, 45, 18] or team theory [20] representations. For example, a typical game or team theory problem statement is concerned with a single decision; a typical T MS objective problem solving ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

.... It has often been observed in human organizations that there is a strong effect of environmental factors such as dynamism and task uncertainty on the necessary coordination actions taken by organization participants to produce organizationally acceptable outcomes (Lawrence Lorsch 1967; Galbraith 1977; Stinchcombe 1990) We and others have often pointed out that this applies to purely computational organizations as well (Fox 1981; This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. IRI9523419 and the Department of Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval ....

Galbraith, J. 1977. Organizational Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

.... of pooled, sequential, and reciprocal processes[34] Burton and Obel s linear programs[3] or Malone s queueing models [26] but is influenced by them, and by the importance of environmental uncertainty and dependency that appear in contingency theoretic and open systems views of organizations [24, 18, 32, 29] Section 2 will discuss the general nature of the three modeling framework layers. Sections 3 through 6 discuss the details of the three levels, and are organized around a model built with this framework for the study of organizational design and coordination strategies in a multi agent ....

.... Organizational theorists have long held that the organization of a set of agents cannot be analyzed separately from the agents task environment, that there is no single best organization for all environments, and that different organizations are not equally effective in a given environment [18]. Most of these theorists view the uncertainties present in the environment as a key characteristic, though they differ in the mechanisms that link environmental uncertainty to effective organization. In particular, the transaction cost economics approach [27] focuses on the relative efficiencies ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

....substrate. The reason that separate, parameterizable modules (creating in effect a family of coordination algorithms, not a single fixed algorithm) are used is that no single coordination algorithm will always be the best (or even good) for all environments [Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967, Galbraith, 1977, Stinchcombe, 1990] We have developed five modules so far, and more will be developed. The modules are not, and do not have to be, entirely independent in their actions because all communication is grounded in the agent s current schedule (they are intended to be used in any combination) If ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

....of the specific application domain. The observation that no single organization or coordination algorithm is the best across environments, problem solving instances, or even particular situations is a common one in the study of both human organizational theory (especially contingency theory) [19, 13, 25] and cooperative distributed problem solving [12, 11, 10, 7] Key features of task environments demonstrated in both these threads of work that lead to different coordination mechanisms include those related to the structure of the environment (the particular kinds and patterns of ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

....and capabilities but are not so costly that they completely undermine short term efficiency In this paper, I explore the benefits and costs of achieving integration through various organizational designs. To this end, I adopt an information processing view of the firm [Marschak Radner, 1972; Galbraith, 1977; Tushman Nadler, 1978] After briefly reviewing some classic work from this perspective, I develop a mathematical model of the acquisition and diffusion within a firm of information, or knowledge, that arises outside the firm. Analyzing the model, I find that, depending on the cost structure, ....

....hierarchical forms of internal integration. 6 A number of organizational design theorists have taken a much more explicit information processing view. Allen [1977] proposes that various structural configurations, such as the use of gatekeepers, will encourage communication and information flows. Galbraith [1977] explores a wide variety of organizational mechanisms that foster internal information flows. Tushman Nadler [1978] suggest that information processing may be used to integrate the organization design literature and develop a number of propositions along these lines. In economics, an information ....

Galbraith, James. 1977. Organizational Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

....overlap between, each agent s area of responsibility the agents organization. The organization may be constructed statically by a system designer, or dynamically by the agents during problem solving. No one organization is optimal across environments or even specific problem solving instances [6, 7, 8]. This paper presents an analysis of static and dynamic organizational structures for this class of environments, exemplified by distributed sensor networks. We first show how the performance of any static organization can be statistically described, and then show under what conditions dynamic ....

.... Organizational theorists have long held that the organization of a set of agents cannot be analyzed separately from the agents task environment, that there is no single best organization for all environments, and that different organizations are not equally effective in a given environment [8]. Most of these theorists view the uncertainties present in the environment as a key characteristic, though they differ in the mechanisms that link environmental uncertainty to effective organization. In particular, the transaction cost economics approach [11] focuses on the relative efficiencies ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

....to predict future behavior. In reality, these distinctions are of course blurred: some computer scientists build sociological descriptions of coordination processes [Hewitt, 1986] some organizational theorists really attempt the design of new coordination mechanisms [Burton and Obel, 1984, Galbraith, 1977] some computer scientists, both in DAI and in distributed processing, use market coordination mechanisms [Malone et al. 1983, Wellman, 1993] the more complex game theoretic mechanisms [Rosenschein and Genesereth, 1985, Zlotkin and Rosenschein, 1991, Gmytrasiewicz et al. 1991] or team ....

....which is undifferentiated. These are weak conclusions about the DVMT, and are mostly meant for illustrative purposes. The important point is that Lawrence and Lorsch s work shows that: 1. not only was there no single good structure, 2. but that the choice of structure really did matter. Galbraith [Galbraith, 1977] further illuminated this model by examining why uncertainty in the environment should be a key independent variable. To Lawrence and Lorsch s correlation he added the following causal link: The greater the amount of uncertainty of the task, the greater the amount of information that has to be ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

.... 1967] Burton and Obel s linear programs [Burton and Obel, 1984] or Malone s queueing models [Malone, 1987] It is influenced by the importance of environmental uncertainty and dependency that appear in contingency theoretic and open systems views of organizations [Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967; Galbraith, 1977; Scott, 1987; Stinchcombe, 1990] T MS allows the quantitative operationalization of many organizational theoretic environmental concepts, especially various dependencies and uncertainties (see the decomposability example, from [Burton and Obel, 1984] later in this paper) that are the basis of ....

Galbraith, J. 1977. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

....of the specific application domain. The observation that no single organization or coordination algorithm is the best across environments, problem solving instances, or even particular situations is a common one in the study of both human organizational theory (especially contingency theory) [24,17,31] and cooperative distributed problem solving [16,14,13,10] Key features of task environments demonstrated in both these threads of work that lead to different coordination mechanisms include those related to the structure of the environment (the particular kinds and patterns of interrelationships ....

J. Galbraith. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.

....single organization or coordination protocol that is the best for all environments. In human organizations, environmental factors such as dynamism and task uncertainty have a strong effect on what coordinated actions are and how organizationally acceptable outcomes arise[Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967, Galbraith, 1977, Stinchcombe, 1990] These effects have been observed in purely computational organizations as well[Fox, 1981, Durfee and Lesser, 1988, Decker and Lesser, 1995, Nagendra Prasad et al. 1996a, Nagendra Prasad et al. 1996b] Achieving effective coordination in a multi agent system (MAS) is a ....

Galbraith, J. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977. 139

No context found.

Galbraith J.R. Organizational Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

No context found.

Galbraith, J.. Organizational Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC