M. S. Fox, "An organizational view of distributed systems," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 70 -- 80, 1981.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....tasks or provide support to human operators during execution [4] 48] Production systems, qualitative reasoning, fuzzy logic and other AI techniques have been Manuscript received July 18, 1992; revised May 7, 1993 and April 8, 1994. A part of this work was supported by the ESPRIT Project P2256 ARCHON (Architecture of Cooperating Heterogeneous On Line Systems) in which participated: Atlas Electronik, JRC Ispra, Queen Mary Westfield College, Framentec Cognitech, IRIDIA, Iberdrola, Labein, EA Technology, Amber, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) University of Amsterdam, ....

....uncertainties inherent in the choice of alternative actions are explicitly considered, so a better basis for building an operational model relating agents and environment is found. This high level model draws on analogies of distributed systems and human organisations. As indicated by Fox [22] information and processing complexity of a system are reduced by the use of abstractions, and coordination complexity by the introduction of slack resources. Solution uncertainty is reduced by the integration of multiple perspectives, and control uncertainty by coordination mechanisms; ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

M. S. Fox, "An Organizational view of distributed systems," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber., vol. 11, pp. 70-80, Jan. 1981.

....subsystems, interconnected through data, control and dependencies. Detailed design, in which behaviour of each architectural component is defined in further detail. 33 8. Related Work Literature on MAS o#ers many contributions on using organization theory concepts to model and design MAS. In [18] Fox introduces the idea of using organization as a metaphor that can be useful in helping to describe, study, and design distributed software systems. In particular, he studies results from managements science to identify e#cient agent organizations. The motivation of our work is similar: we ....

M. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1):70--80, 1981.

....of subsystems, interconnected through data, control and dependencies. Detailed design, in which behaviour of each architectural component is defined in further detail. 8. Related Work Literature on MAS o#ers many contributions on using organization theory concepts to model and design MAS. In [18] Fox introduces the idea of using organization as a metaphor that can be useful in helping to describe, study, and design distributed software systems. In particular, he studies results from managements science to identify e#cient agent organizations. The motivation of our work is similar: we ....

M. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1):70--80, 1981.

....will be fulfilled by agents. An e business example illustrates our purposes. The research is conducted in the context of Tropos, a comprehensive software system development methodology. 1 Introduction Multi Agent System (MAS) architectures can be considered organizations (see e.g. [Fox81], Mal88] Feb98] composed of autonomous and proactive agents that interact with one another in order to cooperate and then achieve either a common goal or simply their own goals. Using real world organizations as an a metaphor, distributed and open systems involving many software entities, such ....

M.S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....particular software qualities. Examples of styles are pipes and filters, event based, layered and the like [Gar93] Examples of software qualities include maintainability, modifiability, portability, etc. Bas98] Multi Agent System (MAS) architectures can be considered as organizations (see e.g. [Fer98, Fox81, Ma188]) composed of autonomous and proactive agents that interact and cooperate with one another in order to achieve common or private goals. Since the fundamental concepts of multi agent systems are intentional and social, rather than implementation oriented, we mm to theories which study social and ....

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....particular software qualities. Examples of styles are pipes and filters, event based, layered and the like [Gar93] Examples of software qualities include maintainability, modifiability, portability, etc. Bas98] Multi Agent System (MAS) architectures can be considered as organizations (see e.g. [Fer98, Fox81, Mal88]) composed of autonomous and proactive agents that interact and cooperate with one another in order to achieve common or private goals. Since the fundamental concepts of multi agent systems are intentional and social, rather than implementation oriented, we turn to theories which study social and ....

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....both the styles and patterns proposed in this work. The research is being conducted within the context of Tropos, a comprehensive software development methodology for agent oriented software. 1 Introduction Multi Agent System (MAS) architectures can be considered as organizations (see e.g. [6, 7, 15]) composed of autonomous and proactive agents that interact and cooperate with one another in order to achieve common or private goals. In this paper, we propose to use real world organizations as a metaphor in order to offer a set of generic architectural patterns (or, styles) for distributed and ....

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....artificial social systems setting. Minsky uses a society metaphor in his work on the society of mind [36] The notion of social choice is an important element in e.g. the work of Jon Doyle [15] Finally, social metaphors appear 40 also in the works of Fox, Kornfeld and Hewitt, Malone, and Simon ([20], 27] 34] 57] concerning organization theory. In this paper we treat the notion of an artificial social system in a relatively narrow sense, and with a particular point of view in mind. We wish to develop a theory to support the design of multi agent environments, and to assist the designer ....

M. S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Trans. Sys., Man., Cyber., 11:70--80, 1981.

....to endow each agent with a module of recognition or intention attribution. Recognizing the intention of others allows coordination, guides the co operation and, finally, ensures the relevance (with direction of efficacity) of the interactions. 2. 4 The Organization Dimension According to [10], we can define an organization as a structure describing how the members of the organization are in relation with one another, and how they interact to achieve a common goal. The structure of an organization is related to the environment in which it evolves, the resources available to produce the ....

Fox M.S. (1981). An Organizational View of Distributed Systems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Univ. Cybern., Vol. SMC11, 70-80.

....and, finally, ensures the relevance (with direction of efficacy) of the interactions. Does studied methodology have an attribution s model or provides it mechanisms of attribution In affirmative, is the construction of this model based on one or more strategies of Dennett According to [Fox 1981], we can define an organization as a structure describing how the members of the organization are in relation and interact to achieve a common goal. The structure of an organization is related to the environment in which it evolves, the resources available to produce the outputs as well as the ....

Fox M.S 1981. An organizational view of distributed systems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Univ. Cybern., vol. SMC-11; pp. 70-80.

....organizational structures, ideas can be obtained for the design of FA C distributed systems. This approach has already proved useful. The cooperating experts paradigm used by Lenat [36] has as its basis a protocol analysis of a group of experts solving problems, and recent work by Fox [19] has shown the similarity between organizational theories and the design of complex knowledge based AI systems. We also believe that ideas from the areas of organizational planning and group problem solving [29, 32] may provide a source of techniques and metaphors for distributed planning. ....

Mark S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, number 354-359, Denver, Colorado, October 1979.

....development. software qualities. Examples of styles are pipes and filters, event based, layered and the like [11] Examples of software qualities include maintainability, modifiability, portability, etc. 1] Multi Agent System (MAS) architectures can be considered as organizations (see e.g. [6, 8, 16]) composed of autonomous and proactive agents that interact and cooperate with one another in order to achieve common or private goals. Since the fundamental concepts of multi agent systems are intentional and social, rather than implementation oriented, we turn to theories which study social and ....

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....work to the latter and of load balancing their activities implicitly de nes an organisational structure based or a hierarchical topology and on a load partitioning control regime. Other exemplar organisational structures include collectives of peers, multi level and multi divisional hierarchies [11], and they can all be modelled in terms of a role model. However, it is conceptually wrong to think of a role model as something that actually de nes the organisational structure. Instead, in the design of a MAS, as well as in the design of any organisation, the role model should derive from the ....

....as rst class abstractions in their own right. The de nition of the system s overall organisational structure can derive from the speci cations collected during the analysis phase, as well as from other factors, related to eciency, simplicity of application design, and organisational theory [11]. In any case, a methodology cannot start the analysis phase by attempting to de ne a complete role model that implicitly sets the organisational structure. Rather, the de nition of the organisational structure is a design choice that should not be anticipated during the analysis phase. In fact: ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

M. S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

....its cooperation with the others. Fox proposes a set of organization structure as single person, group, simple hierarchy, uniform hierarchy, and This work is partly supported by the Research Council of Norway #Grant no. 112577#431#. multi products depending on the complexity of problems #Fox 1989#. Numaoka argues that an organization structure can be hierarchy, market or some combination of them. The hierarchy structure is based on a master slave relationship, and the market organization relies on a supplier buyer relation #Numaoka 1992#. In general, what kind of organization structure ....

....outside a club, a search traverses through the club traders and community traders until a possible peer location is found. 3. 3 The Characteristics of the Club Community Society Organization The club community society organization structure di#ers from other hierarchy organization structures #Fox 1989# #Maruichi, Ichikawa, Tokoro 1990# #Numaoka 1992# #Birman Renesse 1994# in the following ways: Member and Activity Changes For a small agent group, wehave developed a capability revision process to monitor the member and activity changes with the consideration of dependencies among ....

Fox, M. S. 1989. An organizational view of distributed systems. In Bond, A. H., and Gasser, L., eds., DistributedArti#cial Intelligence, 140#150.

No context found.

M. S. Fox, "An organizational view of distributed systems," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 70 -- 80, 1981.

No context found.

M. S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70--80, January 1981.

No context found.

Fox, M.S. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernetics 11, 1 (1981), 70--80.

No context found.

M. S. Fox, "An Organizational View of Distributed Systems," IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 11#1, pp. 70#80, 1981.

No context found.

M. S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70--80, January 1981.

No context found.

M. S. Fox, "An organizational view of distributed systems." IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 70--80, 1981.

No context found.

M. S. Fox. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70--80, January 1981.

No context found.

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11 (1):70-80, January 1981.

No context found.

M.S. Fox. "An organizational view of distributed systems". In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(1):70-80, January 1981.

No context found.

FOX, M. S. An organizational view of distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, v.11, n.1, p.70-80, Jan. 1981.

No context found.

Fox, M.S., An Organizational View of Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-11, 1981, pp. 70-80.

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC