| Baral, C.; Tran, N.; and Tuan, L.-C. 2002. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI/IAAI-2002, 507--512. |
....a first order model. By placing a probability distribution over the different choices, one then obtains a distribution over the set of first order models. Other probabilistic extensions of the situation calculus are given in [25, 11] A probabilistic extension of the action language A is given in [3]. The main idea behind this paper is to develop a combination of Pearl s structural model approach to (probabilistic) causal reasoning with high level formalisms for (probabilistic) reasoning about actions. To this end, we present a combination of Pearl s structural model approach with Poole s ....
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proc. AAAI-02, pp. 507--512.
....a first order model. By placing a probability distribution over the different choices, we then obtain a distribution over the set of first order models. Other probabilistic extensions of the situation calculus are given in [12, 5] A probabilistic extension of the action language A is given in [2]. The main idea behind the present paper is to orthogonally combine qualitative and quantitative uncertainty in a uniform framework for reasoning about actions: Even though there is extensive work on qualitative and quantitative models separately, there is only few work on such combinations. One ....
....We show how to express a number of important problems in probabilistic reasoning about actions (namely, the problems of prediction, postdiction, and planning; see especially [18, 12, 7] in terms of belief states in PC . The work closest in spirit to this paper is perhaps the one by Baral et al. [2], which also proposes a logic based formalism for probabilistic reasoning about actions. However, there are several crucial differences. First, and as a central conceptual difference, our work orthogonally combines quantitative and qualitative uncertainty, in the form of probability distributions ....
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI/IAAI-2002.
....a first order model. By placing a probability distribution over the different choices, one then obtains a distribution over the set of first order models. Other probabilistic extensions of the situation calculus are given in [25, 10] A probabilistic extension of the action language is given in [3]. The main idea behind this paper is to develop a combination of Pearl s structural model approach to (probabilistic) causal reasoning with high level formalisms for (probabilistic) reasoning about actions. To this end, we present a combination of Pearl s structural model approach with Poole s ....
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI/IAAI-2002.
....first order model. By placing a probability distribution over the different choices, one then obtains a distribution over the set of first order models. Other probabilistic extensions of the situation calculus are given in [10, 5] A probabilistic extension of the action language A [7] is given in [2]. In this paper, we present a combination of probabilistic uncertainty with sensing and knowledge in reasoning about actions. Our focus is especially on conditional planning under probabilistic uncertainty with sensing and knowledge. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: We ....
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI/IAAI-2002.
....New Jersey 07974, U.S.A. OBSERVATIONS AND THE PROBABILISTIC SITUATION CALCULUS Background and Objectives Lately, there has been increasing interest in improving the expressive power of logical languages for representing knowledge about dynamic worlds with nondeterminism and uncertainty (e.g. [9, 1, 10, 4, 2]) In this article, we extend previous work on the Probabilistic Situation Calculus [9, 6] a logical language for knowledge representation and reasoning about dynamic worlds in which actions have uncertain effects. In this article, we: Show how to represent knowledge about actions that have ....
C. Baral and L. Tuan. Reasoning about Actions in a Probabilistic Setting. In Commonsense
No context found.
Baral, C.; Tran, N.; and Tuan, L.-C. 2002. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI/IAAI-2002, 507--512.
No context found.
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan, `Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting', in Proc. AAAI/IAAI-2002.
No context found.
Chitta Baral, Nam Tran, Le-Chi Tuan.: Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. Proc. of AAAI-02, 507-512, 2002.
No context found.
C. Baral and L. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proc. of the Fifth Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Common Sense 2001.
No context found.
C. Baral, N. Tran, and L.-C. Tuan. Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting. In Proceedings AAAI-2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC