| Daniel Hardt and Maribel Romero. Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung VI, 2002. |
....clause containing the ellipsis. Our explanation relies on two additional claims, each of which is independently motivated in the grammar. The first claim is that ellipsis resolution, like anaphora resolution in general, is sensitive to discourse structure (see e.g. Kehler, 2000) In particular, (Hardt and Romero, 2002) propose the Discourse Condition on ellipsis in (3) and they support it with examples like (4) 6) In (4) the ellipsis cannot be resolved to eat because the clause S3 [John ate] not being the discourse sister of the E clause S2 [Bill didn t] is not allowed to function as the A clause of S2. In ....
Daniel Hardt and Maribel Romero. Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung VI, 2002.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC