G otz, T., 2000. Feature Constraint Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Seminar f ur Sprachwissenschaft, Universit at T ubingen, T ubingen. http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/dbt/volltexte/2000/133.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles

....of the description language. This would formalize lexical rules parallel to relations like append, or more accurately a binary relation like member. If we chose a formal language for HPSG which allows us to use definite relations within the description language, such as the system defined in G otz (2000) which extends King (1989) with ideas from H ohfeld Smolka (1988) and D orre (1994) it is possible to represent a lexicon including lexical rules in the formal language without extending the signature. The figures 15 and 16 illustrate this possibility. word L 1 : L n lex ....

....of the DLR formalization, we need to pick one of the possibilities discussed above for introducing DLRs into the theory. Since a discussion of how a formal language for HPSG can be extended with relations and which extension is the most appropriate one is a highly complex topic on its own (G otz 2000, Richter 1997, 1999, Richter et al. 1999:see, for example) we avoid this largely orthogonal issue by basing the formalization of DLRs in section 5 on the modular encoding with the lex rule type. Note that the use of STORE and the lex rule type in the modular encoding is quite traditional in that ....

G otz, T., 2000. Feature Constraint Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Seminar f ur Sprachwissenschaft, Universit at T ubingen, T ubingen. http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/dbt/volltexte/2000/133.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC