Arnaut, L., Greenstein, J., 1990. Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing and interface. Human Factors 32 (6), 651--663.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....the eye to display distance was about 0.75 meters, for the standing position the distance was 1.5 meters. Thus the same targets appeared smaller for the standing position. There is an abundance of inconclusive research on the human performance impact of control display relationships (e.g. [1, 2, 12]) In one study, viewing distance was actually controlled over a range of 1.5 to 8 meters [7] however, no difference was found in the operating characteristics of three remote pointing devices. So, we do not feel this is an issue in the present study. For distances greater than a few meters ....

Arnault, L. Y., and Greenstein, J. S. Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing an interface? Human Factors 32 (1990) 651-663

....was) the worse the performance was. Buck [7] called into question the views on the significance of CD gain. Based on results from a target al..ignment experiment, he argued that target width on both the control device and the display were important, but their ratio was not. Arnaut and Greenstein [3] conducted a rather convoluted study in which control input magnitude (movement scale) display output magnitude, display target width, control target width and Fitts index of difficult were varied in two experiments. They found that a greater movement scale increased gross movement time but ....

....AND CONCLUSION Movement scale, control gain, control display ratio and motor joints performance differences, are a set of related concepts in input control literature without consistent conclusions. In terms of movement scale or control gain effects, some researchers found a U shaped function [11, 3]; others straight linear function [9] and yet others did not believe gain or scale should matter much [12, 7] Traditionally these issues have been studied in the framework of target acquisition tasks. We have conducted a systematic study on these issues in a new paradigm the steering law. ....

L. Y. Arnaut and J. S. Greenstein. Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing an interface? Human Factors, 32(6):651--663, 1990.

....was) the worse the performance was. Buck [7] called into question the views on the significance of CD gain. Based on results from a target al..ignment experiment, he argued that target width on both the control device and the display were important, but their ratio was not. Arnaut and Greenstein [3] conducted a rather convoluted study in which control input magnitude (movement scale) display output magnitude, display target width, control target width and Fitts index of difficult were varied in two experiments. They found that a greater movement scale increased gross movement time but ....

....AND CONCLUSION Movement scale, control gain, control display ratio and motor joints performance differences, are a set of related concepts in input control literature without consistent conclusions. In terms of movement scale or control gain effects, some researchers found a U shaped function [11, 3]; others straight linear function [9] and yet others did not believe gain or scale should matter much [12, 7] Traditionally these issues have been studied in the framework of target acquisition tasks. We have conducted a systematic study on these issues in a new paradigm the steering law. ....

L. Y. Arnaut and J. S. Greenstein. Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing an interface? Human Factors, 32(6):651--663, 1990.

No context found.

Arnaut, L., Greenstein, J., 1990. Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing and interface. Human Factors 32 (6), 651--663.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC