| Banerji, A., Panteleenko, V., Wyant, G., Cohn, D., "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options," University of Notre Dame Technical Report TR-96-20 (1996). |
....on the Alpha processor. The author states that porting the modifications to the x86, which has a severely limited register set, would be difficult. Several other researchers in the area of extensible operating systems have developed one off software fault isolation tools, including Banerji [Banerji96] and Engler [Engler95] Unfortunately these tools suffer from working on less widely used platforms, working only with domain specific languages, or not being publicly available. VINO uses MiSFIT, the Minimal i386 Software Fault Isolation Tool, to protect itself from misbehaved extensions. MiSFIT ....
Banerji, A., Panteleenko, V., Wyant, G., Cohn, D., "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options," University of Notre Dame Technical Report TR-96-20 (1996).
....of registers being available for use by the tool; a port to x86, which has an extremely limited register set, is thought to be difficult if not impossible. Several other researchers in the area of extensible operating systems have developed one off software fault isolation tools, including Banerji [Ban96], Engler [Engl95] and Mazieres [personal communication] Unfortunately these tools suffer from working on less widely used platforms, working only with domainspecific languages, or not being publicly available. Some extensible systems designers have followed a different route, proposing that ....
Banerji, A., Panteleenko, V., Wyant, G., Cohn, D., "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options," University of Notre Dame Technical Report TR96 -20 (1996).
....of registers being available for use by the tool; a port to x86, which has a severely limited register set, appears to be difficult, if not impossible. Several other researchers in the area of extensible operating systems have developed one off software fault isolation tools, including Banerji [Banerji96], Engler [Engler95] and Mazieres [Mazieres96] Unfortunately these tools suffer from working on less widely used platforms, working only with domain specific languages, or not being publicly available. Some extensible systems designers have followed a different route, proposing that extensions be ....
Banerji, A., Panteleenko, V., Wyant, G., Cohn, D., "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options," University of Dame Technical Report TR96 -20, 1996.
....cross domain cooperation. The next subsection begins with a comparison of null RPC times. This is followed by a comparison of PSLs with other competitive protection schemes. Finally, the section ends with a breakdown of PSL call costs. A more thorough analysis of PSL performance can be found in [Banerji 96] 5.1 Null RPC Benchmark Table 2 shows the null RPC times for several RPC implementations in AIX 3.2.5 on an RS 6000 Model 530 with a relatively slow 25 Mhz POWER processor. The first two numbers are for classic user level IPC; the third is for hand off scheduling [Black 89] The fourth number ....
Banerji, A. et al. "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options." Technical Report (unnumbered) , University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 1996.
No context found.
A. Banerji, V. Panteleenko, G. Wyant, and D. Cohn. Quantitative analysis of protection options. Technical Report TR-96-20, University of Notre Dame, 1996.
No context found.
A. Banerji et al., "Quantitative Analysis of Protection Options," University of Dame Technical Report TR-96-20, 1996.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC