Tom Mens and Theo D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in uml. Automated Software Engineering Journal, 7(1):39--59, February 2000. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
The Context-Based Constraint Language Ccl For Components - Bubl (2002) (1 citation) (Correct)
....can be verified during modelling, during deployment and at run Validation at Modelling at Configuration at Runtime time. They facilitate description, comprehension and reasoning on di#erent levels and support checking the compliance of a system with requirements automatically. According to [39], automated support for software evolution is central to solving some very important technical problems in current day software engineering. ....
Tom Mens and Theo D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in UML. Automated Software Engineering, 7(1):39--59, 2000.
Evolving Partitions in Conceptual Schemas in the UML - Gómez, Olivé (2002) (Correct)
....an evolution of the information system that supports those activities. The evolution must be done always efficiently, and often quickly and without interrupting critical services [2] Automated support for information system evolution becomes central to satisfy these evolution requirements [12]. Ideally, the evolution of information systems should follow the strategy called forward information system maintenance in [8] changes should be applied directly to the conceptual schema, and from here they should propagate automatically down to the database logical schema(s) and application ....
# Mens, T.; DHondt, T. Automating Support for Software Evolution in UML, Automated Software Engineering, 7, pp. 39-59.
External Requirements Validation for Component-Based Systems - Leicher, Bübl (2002) (Correct)
....automatically as described in [3] It is changing contexts that drive evolution. CoCons are context based and are therefore easily adapted if the contexts, the requirements or the configuration changes. The compliance of a system with requirements can now verified automatically. According to [11], automated support for software evolution is central to solving some very important technical problems in current day software engineering. ....
Tom Mens and Theo D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in UML. Automated Software Engineering, 7(1):39--59, 2000.
The Context-Based Constraint Language CCL for Components - Bübl (2002) (Correct)
....modelling, during deployment and at run Validation at Modelling at Configuration at Runtime time. They facilitate description, comprehension and reasoning at the di#erent levels, The compliance of a system or a system model with requirements can now verified automatically. According to [21], automated support for software evolution is central to solving some very important 5.2. BENEFITS OF CCL 44 technical problems in current day software engineering. ....
Tom Mens and Theo D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in UML. Automated Software Engineering, 7(1):39--59, 2000.
Designing Distributed Component-Based Systems With DCL - Bübl, Leicher (Correct)
....modifications compromise intended functionality. DCL assists preventing unanticipated side effects during redesign, and they support collaborative distributed design management. The compliance of a system or a system model with distribution requirements can now verified automatically. According to [17], automated support for software evolution is central to solving some very important technical problems in current day software engineering. It is changing contexts that drive evolution. DCL s constraints are context based and are therefore easily adapted if the context, the requirements or the ....
T. Mens and T. D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in UML. Automated Software Engineering, 7(1):39--59, 2000.
Regulating Software Development Process by Formal Contracts - Pons, Baum (Correct)
....contract describes a set of interacting participants. Reuse contracts can only be adapted by means of reuse operators that record both the protocol between developers and users of a reusable component and the relationship between different versions of one component that has evolved. Similarly, in [18] the authors extend the idea of reuse contracts in order to cope with reuse and evolution of UML models. The originality of process contracts resides in the fact that software developers are incorporated into the formalism as agents (or coalition of agents) who make decisions and have ....
Mens,T., Lucas,C. and D'Hondt, T.. Automating support for software evolution in UML. Automated Software Engineering Journal 7:1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, February 2000.
Towards Automating Source-consistent UML Refactorings - Van Gorp, Stenten, Mens.. (2003) (2 citations) Self-citation (Mens) (Correct)
No context found.
Tom Mens and Theo D'Hondt. Automating support for software evolution in uml. Automated Software Engineering Journal, 7(1):39--59, February 2000.
A Uniform Declarative Framework for Automated Software Merging - Mens, Mens (2000) Self-citation (Mens) (Correct)
No context found.
T. Mens, T. D'Hondt, "Automating Support for Software Evolution in UML," Automated Software Engineering Journal 7:1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, February 2000.
A Formal Foundation for Object-Oriented Software Evolution - Mens (2001) (1 citation) Self-citation (Mens) (Correct)
No context found.
T. Mens and T. D'Hondt, "Automating support for software evolution in UML", J. Automated Software Engineering 7, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 3959.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC