Wood, B., Pethia, R., Gold, L.R., Firth, R.: A Guide to the Assessment of Software Development Methods. Technical Report CMUSEI-88-TR-8, SEI, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1988) Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Comparing Agent-Oriented Methodologies - Dam, Winikoff (2003) (2 citations) (Correct)
....attributes but also properties which are uniquely found in AOSE. In order to avoid using an inappropriate comparison framework the properties in our framework are derived from a survey of work on comparing AOSE methodologies [5, 15, 23, 24] and more importantly on comparing OO methodologies [9, 10, 12, 21, 22, 25]. The comparison framework covers four major aspects of each AOSE methodology: Concepts, Modelling language, Process and Pragmatics. This framework is adapted from a framework proposed in [9] for comparing Object Oriented Methodologies. In addition to the four above components, that framework ....
....of three main components [10] symbols (either graphical or textual representation of the concepts) syntax and semantics. It is important that the modelling language allows the system under development to be modelled from di#erent views such as behavioural, functional and structural views [25]. As a result, by having a good modelling notation the methodology e#ectively eases the complex tasks of requirement analysis, specification analysis and design. Therefore, measuring the quality of the modelling language of an AOSE methodology plays an important part in our evaluation. The ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
B. Wood, R. Pethia, L.R. Gold, and R Firth. A guide to the assessment of software development methods. Technical Report 88-TR-8, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988.
Determining When to Use an Agent-Oriented Software.. - O'Malley, DeLoach (2001) (Correct)
....a particular problem. However, based on these guidelines alone, there is still no clear answer. 3 1. 2 Software Engineering Methodology Classification In 1988, the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) presented a set of guidelines for assessing software development methods for real time systems [17]. The guidelines define a five step process for evaluating different methodologies. These five steps are: 1. Needs Analysis Determine the important characteristics of the system to be developed and how individual methods help developers deal with those characteristics. 2. Constraint ....
....is discussed in detail below. 2. 1 Management Issues As indicated above, this category is closely related to the management and usage characteristics as defined by [6] Because of their universal applicability, many of the issues addressed that pertain to this category are taken from the [17], as the management and usage issues for selecting a software development method for realtime systems are practical for any type of system. Below is the initial set of issues selected for this category. Cost of Acquiring the Methodology (Meth) Cost of Acquiring Support Tools (Tool) ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Wood, B., Pethia, R., Gold, L.R., and Firth, R.: A Guide to the Assessment of Software Development Methods. Software Engineering Institute Technical Report 88-TR-8. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1988)
Determining When to Use an Agent-Oriented Software.. - O'Malley, DeLoach (2001) (Correct)
....to a particular problem. However, based on these guidelines alone, there is still no clear answer. 1. 2 Software Engineering Methodology Classification In 1988, the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) presented a set of guidelines for assessing software development methods for real time systems [12]. The guidelines are a five step process for evaluating different methodologies. The five steps of the guidelines from [12] are given below: 1. Needs Analysis Determine the important characteristics of the system to be developed and how individual methods help developers deal with those ....
....Methodology Classification In 1988, the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) presented a set of guidelines for assessing software development methods for real time systems [12] The guidelines are a five step process for evaluating different methodologies. The five steps of the guidelines from [12] are given below: 1. Needs Analysis Determine the important characteristics of the system to be developed and how individual methods help developers deal with those characteristics. 2. Constraint Identification Identify the constraints imposed on the permitted solutions and determine how ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Wood, B., Pethia, R., Gold, L.R., and Firth, R., A Guide to the Assessment of Software Development Methods. Software Engineering Institute Technical Report 88-TR-8. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1988).
A Feature Analysis Framework for Evaluating Multi-agent.. - Tran, Low, Williams (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Wood, B., Pethia, R., Gold, L.R., Firth, R.: A Guide to the Assessment of Software Development Methods. Technical Report CMUSEI-88-TR-8, SEI, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1988)
Selecting A Software Engineering - Methodology Using Multiobjective (Correct)
No context found.
Wood, Bill, Richard Pethia, Lauren Roberts Gold, and Robert Firth. "A Guide to the Assessment of Software Development Methods," Software Engineering Institute Technical Report 88-TR-8, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, July 1988.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC