| T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Trans. Comput. Systems 10(1), Feb. 1992. |
....thread per processor, but it fails on multiprogrammed systems, in which a neighbor thread may be preempted, and thus unable to cooperate. Theproblem of preemption in critical sections has received considerable attention over the years. Alternative strategies include avoidance [6, 10, 14] recovery [3, 4], and tolerance [9, 16] The latter approach is appealing for commercial applications because it does not require modification of the kernel interface: if a thread waits too long for a lock, it assumes that the lock holder has been preempted. It abandons its attempt, yields the processor to ....
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
....benefit is not as large as for g,rep. This difference occurs because the sort copies into memory aThe gray box versions of grep do not follow the exact se mantics of grep, because the output may be ordered differently. If semantics must be preserved, the output of grep can be re ordered as in [28] however, the application may then thrash when outputting a large number of matches. 49 Figure 3: Application Performance. The performance of 9re nd ysor o. Te emo.t br for e mifi appliti on ted runs ove wuohly I GB of otal data (9rep s of a 1 CB input file in 55 sounds) gup ss the iative ....
....system via the pipe mchanism; this copy is palatable in the sort because it does not use much of the CPU during I O, but may not be acceptable in all stuatons. Multiple Platform Tests: To demonstrate that our gray box approach works well on a rnge of operating systems, we examine FCCD on Linux 2.2.17, NetBSD 1.5, and So[aris 7. In our experiments, we compare the perforwnce of two microbenchmarks (a file scan and a multi file search) measuring unmodied performance on both a cold and warm file cache and modified graysbox performance on a warm cache. Figure 4 plots the relative execution ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
T. Anderson, B. Betshad, E. Lazowska, and H. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. In SOSP 13, October 1991.
No context found.
Anderson, T., Bershad, B., Lazowska, E., and Levy, H. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. In ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, pp. 53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
Anderson, T., Bershad, B., Lazowska, E., and Levy, H. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 10(1), February 1992.
No context found.
Thomas Anderson, Brian Bershad, Edward Lazowska, and Henry Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. In ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, pages 53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Trans. Comput. Systems 10(1), Feb. 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler activations: effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. In Proc. 13th ACM Symp. on Op. Sys. Princ., 1991.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, Feb. 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Trans. on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, Feb. 1992.
No context found.
T. Anderson, B. Bershad, E. Lazowska, and H. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
T. Anderson, B. Bershad, E. Lazowska, and H. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler activations: effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 95--109. ACM Press, 1991.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 10(1):53--79, Feb. 1992.
No context found.
T. Anderson, B. Bershad, E. Lazowska, and H. Levey. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for User-level Management of Parallelism. ACM Trans. on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, Feb. 1992.
No context found.
Thomas Anderson, Brian Bershad, Edward Lazowska, and Henry Levy, Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for User Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, February 1992. 10(1).
No context found.
T. E. Anderson et al. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. In ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. In Proc. of the 13th ACM Symp. on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), pages 95--109, Pacific Grove, CA, Oct. 1991.
No context found.
T. Anderson, B. Bershad, E. Lazowska, and H. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
Thomas E. Anderson, Brian N. Bershad, Edward D. Lazowska, and Henry M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. In Proc. of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 95-109, October 1991.
No context found.
ANDERSON,T.E.,BERSHAD, B. N., LAZOWSKA, E. E., AND LEVY, H. W. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer systems 10,1 (February 1992), 53--79.
No context found.
Thomas E. Anderson, Brian N. Bershad, Edward D. Lazowska, and Henry M. Levy. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53-- 79, February 1992. Available from http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/ cs262/Scheduler.pdf.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 10(1):53--79, Feb. 1992.
No context found.
Thomas E. Anderson, Brian N. Bershad, Edward D. Lazowska, and Henry M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson et al. Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the user-level management of parallelism. In ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1992.
No context found.
T. E. Anderson, B. N. Bershad, E. D. Lazowska, and H. M. Levy. Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level Management of Parallelism. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 10(1):53--79, February 1992.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC