| C. Perkins, Mobile IP, IEEE Communication (1997) 84 -- 99. |
....its major drawbacks that have led to the definition of the micro mobility approach. 3.1 Mobile IP Mobile IP is probably the most widely known mobility management proposal. Its simplicity and scalability give it a growing success. Mobile IP is described in [2] a good review paper can be found in [31]) Several extensions and enhancements are described in [28, 29, 35, 9] Here, we discuss the principles of Mobile IP and ignore the differences between the IPv6 and IPv4 versions. To allow a mobile IP node to change its WIPPOA, Mobile IP defines two types of Mobility Agent (MA) the Home Agent ....
Charles E. Perkins. Mobile IP. IEEE Communications, 35(5):84--99, May 1997.
.... wired standards [12] datalink medium access layer (L2) the standardized architectures of point to point topologies such as cellular telephone endpoints and bridged wireless devices [12, 20] network layer (L3) extending the point topoints across multiple, politically controlled domains [16, 24, 25, 26]; transport layer (L4) producing and maintaining the end to end services in the face of multiple and di ering error rates, wire speeds, and latencies [3, 4, 7] and supporting standards such as Dynamic Host Con ed for that local broadcast domain (from the same Class C block xed hierarchy of ....
....to the local station . The above scenarios illustrate that the LANE implementation of mobility is optimized for communication between nodes in the same LIS. Past trac patterns show that trac sources usually send to destinations that reside on the same IP subnetwork (e.g. LANE subnetwork) [25]. Even where new applications like the Web change usage patterns, distributed storage, like Web caches, will bring significant amounts of this trac back to local network attached devices. Thus, it is important to explore the performance of our LANE solution to the mobility problem. Slow moving ....
C. Perkins. Mobile IP. IEEE Communications, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 84-99, May 1997.
....that have led to the definition of the micro mobility approach. 1.3.1 Mobile IP Mobile IP is the oldest and probably the most widely known mobility management proposal. Its simplicity and scalability give it a growing success. Mobile IP is described in [1] a good review paper can be found in [22]) Several extensions and enhancements are described in [19, 20, 26, 6] In this document, we discuss the principles of Mobile IP and the discussion is applicable to both IPv6 and IPv4. In order to allow a mobile IP node to change its IPPOA in the network, Mobile IP defines two types of Mobility ....
Charles E. Perkins. Mobile IP. IEEE Communications, 35(5):84--99, May 1997.
No context found.
C. Perkins, Mobile IP, IEEE Communication (1997) 84 -- 99.
No context found.
C. Perkins. Mobile IP. IEEE Communications, pages 84--99, May 1997.
No context found.
Charles E. Perkins. Mobile IP. IEEE Communications, 35(5):84--99, May 1997.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC