Forbus, K., Ferguson, R. and Usher, J. (2001). Towards a computational model of sketching. IUI'01, January 14-17, 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Segmentation and Alignment of Speech and Sketching in a Design.. - Adler (2003) (Correct)
....and ideas the are outlined in the BEATRIX work may be applicable to our system. In fact, the next generation of our system is blackboard based like BEATRIX (see Section 7.3 t. 6.4 Other Sketching Systems The other related field is sketching. There are several groups working on sketching e.g. [10, 6]. Each system is a little bit different, but Forbus, et al. note that there are not any sketching systems that use mixed initiative dialogues[6] This requires a greater level of conceptual understanding, which is a long term goal we have (see Section 7.5) Another sketching systems is sKEA or ....
....BEATRIX (see Section 7.3 t. 6.4 Other Sketching Systems The other related field is sketching. There are several groups working on sketching e.g. 10, 6] Each system is a little bit different, but Forbus, et al. note that there are not any sketching systems that use mixed initiative dialogues[6]. This requires a greater level of conceptual understanding, which is a long term goal we have (see Section 7.5) Another sketching systems is sKEA or sketching Knowledge Entry Associate de veloped at Northwestern University[7] The sKEA work focuses on conceptual and visual understanding and ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Kenneth D. Forbus, Ronald W. Ferguson, and Jeffrey M. Usher. Towards a com- putational model of sketching. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 77 83. ACM Press, 2001.
Sketch Understanding in Design: Overview of Work at the MIT AI Lab - Davis (2002) (Correct)
....advantages of an online medium. Related Work References to our work cited below contain detailed discussions of related work for the individual efforts. Overviews of comparable efforts at sketch understanding as a means of interaction are described in [Oviatt00] Landay01] Stahovich97] and [Forbus01]. Acknowledgements The work reported here is supported by the MIT Oxygen Project and has been carried out by: Aaron Adler, Christine Alvarado, Tracy Hammond, Michael Oltmans, Metin Sezgin, and Olga Veselova. ....
Kenneth Forbus, R. Ferguson, and J. Usher. Towards a computational model of sketching. In IUI '01, 2001.
Naturally Conveyed Explanations of Device Behavior - Oltmans, Davis (2001) (2 citations) (Correct)
....feedback about the system s current understanding of the explanation and o#er some structure to the explanation which may provide additional constraints on the interpretation of the explanations. This inclusion of the computer as an active participant is an approach that is also advocated in [8] and fits into our overall goal of providing an interface that is as close as possible to person to person interactions. A second improvement would be the extension of the reference disambiguation facilities. As mentioned earlier (Section 5.3.2) there has been previous work on this topic (e.g. ....
K. Forbus, R. Ferguson, and J. Usher. Towards a computational model of sketching. In Proceedings of the
A Framework for Multi-Domain Sketch Recognition - Alvarado, Davis (1 citation) (Correct)
....we believe they are a feasible approach for recognition because underconstrained productions are acceptable for recognition, but not for generation. Other sketch recognition systems include those developed by Landay and Meyers (Landay Myers 2001) Do and Gross (Do Gross 1996) Forbus et al. (Forbus, Ferguson, Usher 2001) and Stahovich (Stahovich 1999) Each system copes with recognition ambiguity in a di#erent way. Our previous work (Alvarado Davis 2001) uses context to disambiguate between multiple interpretations of a sketch, but is still driven by low level recognition accuracy. The work described here ....
Forbus, K.; Ferguson, R.; and Usher, J. 2001. Towards a computational model of sketching. In IUI '01.
From Visual to Logical Representation A GIS-Based Sketching.. - John Li Cleo (Correct)
....division such as the 5 th Mechanized division will be positioned at that location but rather that any available mechanized division can play that role in the plan. There again, the critiquing rules needed to take this into account. Related Work The nuSketch tool of Northwestern University [Forbus et al., 2000], under development during the HPKB program, has been intended to have a similar functionality to ArCS. It uses in addition a combination of speech and gesture to specify COA elements in order to free commanders from mouse and menus. Important differences include the fact that the ArCS system used ....
Forbus, K., Feguson, R., Usher, J., 2000, "Toward a Computational Model of Sketching", in preparation for AAAI-2000.
A Structure Mapping Model for Solving Geometric Analogy.. - Tomai, Lovett, Forbus.. Self-citation (Forbus Usher) (Correct)
No context found.
Forbus, K., Ferguson, R. and Usher, J. (2001). Towards a computational model of sketching. IUI'01, January 14-17, 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico
Object-Action Association: A HCI Design Model - Pastel, Skalsky (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Forbus, K., Ferguson, R. and User, J. Towards a computational model of sketching. IUI'01, 2001, 77-83.
Speech and Sketching for Multimodal Design - Adler, Davis (2004) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
K. D. Forbus, R. W. Ferguson, and J. M. Usher. Towards a computational model of sketching. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 77--83. ACM Press, 2001.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC